Body image 1 text
T-Mobile
LTE
11:33
@ 90%
This pamphlet is the line of the Party. You have to
understand that the ultraleft has long attacked our
party using similar rhetoric. Yes there exists a
contradiction between indigenous territories which
are still suffering under colonial relations. However,
America’s bloody founding doesn’t invalidate the
existence of an American people and the
multinational character of America.
Our Party stands in contrast with the other left as
we recognize America as a reality, not an ideal or
mistake. The ultra left has taken the identity
politics of the 1960s and substituted it for a
Bolshevik stance on national self determination.
Furthermore “BIPOC” is a liberal catchphrase
which infantizilies and assumes an assumption of
“intersectionality” which is an anti-Marxist political
theory. Black Americans and Native Americans are
different nations within America and have a unique
history, relationship with the land and a struggle
against racism and capitalism.
v Reply
Mail
Search
16
Calendar
Body image 2 text
T-Mobile
LTE
11:33
@ 890/0(—)
We are not a party of the ultraleft and do not take
the settlers line. “white” Americans today are not
settlers. Furthermore the category of “white” can’t
adequately describe the regional nations that have
formed as a result of immigration and the
interactions of Americans of European descent to
Americans of non-European backgrounds.
Regional nations such as Appalachia, New
England, Aztlan, Black Belt, Rustbelt have long
since developed within America.
Our party line is the same of that of the CPUSA of
old. We seek renegotiation of treaties, the full
rights and reparations for native nations which will
allow them to preserve and expand culture, living
standards, industry and land. This line is
completely within Lenin’s concept of national self
determination and the Bolshevik policy.
v Reply
Mail
Search
16
Calendar
Body image 1 text T-Mobile LTE 11:33 @ 90% This pamphlet is the line of the Party. You have to understand that the ultraleft has long attacked our party using similar rhetoric. Yes there exists a contradiction between indigenous territories which are still suffering under colonial relations. However, America’s bloody founding doesn’t invalidate the existence of an American people and the multinational character of America. Our Party stands in contrast with the other left as we recognize America as a reality, not an ideal or mistake. The ultra left has taken the identity politics of the 1960s and substituted it for a Bolshevik stance on national self determination. Furthermore “BIPOC” is a liberal catchphrase which infantizilies and assumes an assumption of “intersectionality” which is an anti-Marxist political theory. Black Americans and Native Americans are different nations within America and have a unique history, relationship with the land and a struggle against racism and capitalism. v Reply Mail Search 16 Calendar
Body image 2 text T-Mobile LTE 11:33 @ 890/0(—) We are not a party of the ultraleft and do not take the settlers line. “white” Americans today are not settlers. Furthermore the category of “white” can’t adequately describe the regional nations that have formed as a result of immigration and the interactions of Americans of European descent to Americans of non-European backgrounds. Regional nations such as Appalachia, New England, Aztlan, Black Belt, Rustbelt have long since developed within America. Our party line is the same of that of the CPUSA of old. We seek renegotiation of treaties, the full rights and reparations for native nations which will allow them to preserve and expand culture, living standards, industry and land. This line is completely within Lenin’s concept of national self determination and the Bolshevik policy. v Reply Mail Search 16 Calendar
This action was performed by a bot.
Awesome! This works too!