Yes, if you look at the picture, those already very tall buildings were photographed from the angle that makes the bottom cut off, thus creating illusion they are going further down and seems much taller.
Some better ones. Make not mistake, it is probably the tallest and densest residental district in the world (it’s prety famous actually, there a lot of pictures in the internet), but it’s not nearly as awful as they make it to be. Sure as hell beats homelessness and shantytowns. Not to mention something like the old Kowloon.
Yes, if you look at the picture, those already very tall buildings were photographed from the angle that makes the bottom cut off, thus creating illusion they are going further down and seems much taller.
Hence why I asked for a different angle
Hehe, first, have an even worse one:
Some better ones. Make not mistake, it is probably the tallest and densest residental district in the world (it’s prety famous actually, there a lot of pictures in the internet), but it’s not nearly as awful as they make it to be. Sure as hell beats homelessness and shantytowns. Not to mention something like the old Kowloon.
So they comfortably housed a shitload of people AND those people still have a lot of green on the ground level and close by? Neat.
Hauling shit up the stairs must be hell tho. Imagine having the top flat and the elevator is broken.
Well it beats being homeless for sure
Yeah but the people don’t have freedom to be homeless! /s