In summary, the key points of the proposed peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine included:

  1. Potential EU membership for Ukraine but no NATO military alliance.
  2. Crimea remaining under Russian control with unconditional sovereignty.
  3. The future status of “LNR/DNR” to be determined in personal negotiations between Zelensky and Putin.
  4. Other occupied territories by Russia after February 24, 2022 were not mentioned but agreed upon withdrawal of troops.
  5. Use of Russian language alongside Ukrainian in official spheres was proposed but rejected by Ukraine.
  6. Foreign weapons and troops ban with reduction of the Ukrainian army to certain levels.
  7. Security for Ukraine guaranteed by P5 international security forces, excluding Crimea and Sevastopol.
  8. Belarus as a guarantor state was proposed by Russia while Turkey was requested by Ukraine.
  9. In case of an attack on Ukraine, all guarantor states had to agree on response but Kyiv opposed this wanting its airspace closed and weapons provided.

The WSJ comments that this document “appears to be largely based on the 1990 treaty that created unified Germany.” Negotiations continued until June 2022, including via Zoom, but ultimately, they ceased at Ukraine’s initiative. “Ultimately, no deal was reached. The scale of Russian military crimes in Ukraine became apparent, Ukraine’s military successes improved, and the West provided weapons to support Kyiv.” It was previously stated by Arakhamia that Ukraine refused to sign a peace agreement in 2022, partly due to Boris Johnson’s position.

Turns out that Putin wasn’t lying after all about this peace deal. These “punishing terms” in retrospect, look pretty good for Ukraine.

  • SpaceDogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Punishing” is a weird term to use since these seem pretty realistic and tame. If the punishment is not joining NATO, that’s actually a mercy. Being in NATO puts a target on your back and removes any sovereignty you could’ve ever had (the US). Getting weapons from NATO is bad enough, it’s quite literally destroying Ukraine, so not joining is for the best. I don’t even know if they could leave NATO after joining.

    The Crimea issue I will never understand, did they not consent to joining Russia? Why do you want to keep a region that doesn’t want to be there?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly, it seems that western media is no longer able to deny that serious negotiations were happening, and now they’re trying to paint it as Russia being Draconian and forcing some unreasonable deal up on Ukraine. But anybody with a functioning brain can look at what’s currently unfolding and realize that this was a far better option.