At first I was a bit skeptical about the 14/88 thing, admittedly it did sound like it could plausibly have been 2 random numbers of tanks(maybe it is anyways it doesn’t really matter tbh it’s still being used to defend a client state of Imperialism) but after seeing this comment, idk. This almost makes me double down as illogical as that sounds. The entire analysis is ridiculous and I almost thought it was a joke.
Until the last line I was sure they were being sarcastic, wtf man. How can someone list a string of highly unlikely councidences and go “the people saying these ‘coincidences’ overlapping with a very simple fact aren’t coincidences are the actual propagandists”