• ComradeSalad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The memorial itself used a line coined by Goebbels of describing the attack as an “Anglo-American terror bombing”, which is hilarious considering that the Germans were perfectly fine with terror bombing their enemies.

    Moscow had over 50,000 incendiary bombs dropped on it, Kiev and Minsk were razed. London and other English cities were terror bombed nonstop and the ensuing fires were catastrophic.

    But when it’s a sad little Nazi city, now the Germans want to cry. They made their bed, they can lie in it to. Using a line from Goebbels is the cherry on top. This wasn’t a memorial, it was a propaganda statement.

    • Anatolianin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fuck, I looked for photos of Minsk after World War II, it’s terrible, I didn’t even know about it

      • ComradeSalad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You see those buildings left standing? That was known as the Central Prospect and those are the only remaining buildings from “Old Minsk”. The Germans only left them standing because that’s where the officers lived during the occupation.

        They purposefully destroyed everything else.

        On the first day of the war, the first target the Luftwaffe designated was the city water supply to prevent firefighters from putting out the fires from ensuing raids.

        • redtea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          10 months ago

          The blueprint for bombing Libya, then.

          • ComradeSalad
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Everything old is new again. The tactics of terror bombing and inflicting maximum suffering on a civilian population have changed little since WW2. Most of the NATO bombing doctrine was informed or created by the same Nazi monsters who used those methods during the war.

          • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            10 months ago

            I work with a lib whose eyes literally glaze over when I talk about Libya and how utterly unjust we were with them and he murmurs something about Gaddafi being a dictator who imprisoned/executed opposition, and he actually has no idea if that happened but it’s an African country so he’s taking a ‘safe bet’ that that was at play. He literally knows nothing about our actions over there or the why, but he’s a lib, through and through.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The reason they removed it now is pretty clear though, and it’s not because they feel bad about what the nazis did to USSR.

    • sperwing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      The memorial stated pretty clearly that the terror was coming from Germany

    • LarkinDePark
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This kind of thinking justifies Russia razing Ukrainian cities to the ground. Or any in the USA for that matter.