• mughaloidOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Muslims in India and Bangladesh don’t have much caste system but Indian hindus have. Religious fundamentalism has played a crucial on the downfall of secularism and rationality in South Asia due to the funding of wahabi movements from Saudis and Qataris.

    • supersolid_snake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh yeah, Muslim and other nations primarily were gravitating towards left wing socialism post independence but the west and their puppets made sure there was a reactionary tilt. But let’s not give colonization and compradors a bail out by blaming only religion. The Pakistan army and elites don’t have a religion problem, they have a greed problem.

      • mughaloidOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pakistan was pretty much dead when it was pronounced that it will be Islamic republic and Urdu would be the national language. Pakistan is much more diverse and beautiful than what political parties , ulema made out to be. Pakistan has baloch , punjabi , sindhi (the land of sufis and indus valley civilization) and has numerous languages but in the long term military dictatorship and religious fanaticism has prevented pakistan to become a country of unity in diversity . Yes , Indians have those problems too but in Pakistan much of regionalism was suppressed at the start and you can see the departure of bangladesh because of that.

        • supersolid_snake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Bangladesh got separated because bhutto and his generals were power hungry, greedy pieces of shit. It had nothing to do with religion or culture. If they had just respected the elections, all that bloodshed could have been avoided. I am not saying religion isn’t a factor but let’s stop acting like little bill mahers here.

          Edit: the bhutto family is still fucking up Pakistani politics and development with their greed.

          To add: Those compradors ousting Imran Khan in the coup had nothing at all to do with religion and culture. All the elites saw the social welfare programs and corruption being curtailed (even 1%) and they got antsy and helped America do a coup.

          • mughaloidOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I am not fan of any religion and you know very well Islamic Republic of Pakistan was the foundational problem for East bengal and Pakistan itself. You can gloss over the religion part but Jinnah thought declaring Urdu as national language will bring pious Muslims closer to Islam or will have a national identity. Even now Baloch people are suppressed there. You cannot build a sound society when you declare a society will be built on a particular religion not by pragmatic and secular law. You can watch Com.Taimur Rehman of Pakistan for his ideas and thoughts.

            • supersolid_snake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I have watched taimur rehman stuff before. In fact when I stopped listening to him was when he said the recent coup had no US involvement on Luna Oi’s show and then the leaked memos came out that they did. He is a bhutto fan boy and that family sucks. So do the Sharifs, Zardaris, other elites and the military. Feudalist are not socialists, sorry not sorry bhutto family.

              Is religion a particularly strong factor there? Yes, not the only one. Religious parties never win in elections there though and even trump pretended to read the Bible to kiss evangelical ass here. That’s just how it goes.

              Did Imran Khan use religious principles to garner support for social welfare programs and speak up for the oppressed? Sure did, it’s a country full of Muslims after all. Did he give Sikhs access to their holy sites in a gesture of tolerance? Yep.

              Did he win an election free and fair despite being pushtoon, a minority in Pakistan? Yep, and he is even further in the polls now despite tens of thousands of political arrests and military crackdowns. He even wins in Punjab province. People will put aside their differences there for a leader of good conscience, efficacy aside (even his fans admit he made mistakes, but he is a decent person).

              Is Urdu a national language there? Yes, so is English actually. It has more English speakers than England even.

              While I am not disagreeing with you 100%, I don’t want to condemn pakistanis as too religious/ culturally bias to have better lives. It would take more than a few families and the military stripped of their wealth and power there but it would be a great start.

              Edit: I also wanted to make it clear that I am glad we are having this discussion as we both clearly care about the country. No animosity on my part.

              • mughaloidOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I love Taimur rehman, actually I had some friends in sindh who didn’t like him too because he was too much this or that. I don’t want to get into internal pakistani business but I also think it was not a coup per se, even Vijay Prashad of India agrees with it. There might be some pressure from US on Pakistani military but I think Imran khan was naive, he surrendered to the military when iron was hot, he should have gone for a wider change Or a democratic government. Well, it’s unfortunate left wing parties are weak in Pakistan , India and Bangladesh.