Open ended question

  • SovereignState
    link
    101 year ago

    “The Social Dilemma”, while being unbridled from legitimacy or seriousness via a dumbass “both sides bad” fictional story underneath the actual documentary, is a worthwhile watch if you can continue to think critically while it shows you the dumbass B plot. Social media, at least in the West, currently functions mostly as a right-wing radicalizer, a violent political polarizer, an advertising pit, an addiction in and of itself, a gateway to porn and other insidious habits, sites for scams, sites for stalking… I could go on and on. I think in its current form, it’s poisoning the minds of billions. I like to foresee a future where we have a healthy social media, but I honestly have very little idea what that would look like.

    • SovereignState
      link
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Might be old news by now but the Rohingya massacre would not have been successful as it was/is without Facebook. Anti-Muslim forces used it to propagate violently islamophobic propaganda, and made it mandatory to have Facebook installed on your phone.

      Re: The Social Dilemma’s both-sidesism, it’s so cringe. The boy in the story gets radicalized by a group of people whose big violent thing is… “Don’t Vote!” What horrible extremists! The filmmakers had a veritable smorgasbord of right-wing terrorist attacks only made possible through social media dissemination to choose from, and they came up with the most libshit, centrist ass take they could. Jokers.

      • Muad'DibberA
        link
        61 year ago

        I remember it having major radical centrist vibes too. But you’re right it did do a good job of platforming insiders of these tech companies, telling us how insidious they are, and the psychological harm they’re doing.