• loathesome dongeater
    link
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yeah it has a lot of benefits for capitalist class. More homes are sold, more home loans are taken out, as people become atomised they become more dependent on cars, as families are broken functions are families are moved on to the plates of businesses (for example childcare). When I was younger I used to spend a lot of time with my friends and at my friends’ homes if my parents were busy which they often were. This kind of social cohesion within and between families becomes a bit rarer everyday.

    • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes it’s capitalism. Note how capitalism literally created the nuclear family because it needed its workforce to be fully ready and available to every whim of the market. Capitalist media also present people not wanting to move from their town as losers, and i can’t even count the moments i was given some real disdain in words and body language during searching for work when i didn’t wanted to commute very far. Nothing really changed since Cato the Elder, we are fully expect to be slaves for the scrap of a wage. Continuing about the family, it progress still. Nuclear family is the smallest social cell, but it is still too big and too anchored for capitalism to realise their aims. Recently there is the trend of “you will own nothing and you will be happy” - micro houses, capsules, bunk beds, etc pushed in the media and it is glaringly obvious what the purpose is, it is to normalize living as disposable labour soldier, to create an army of labour, but “army” in the most literal sense, a cheap, ready for anything workforce with no expectations - basically slaves. And in such conditions, it is impossible to not only to have a new family but also to keep in touch with your already existing one.