D’Souza’s childish dishonesty is not particularly interesting after you’ve seen it so many times (in the 1990s, for example, he seriously claimed that U.S. slavery ‘bore no necessary link to racism’). What’s interesting is that he is now defending a confirmed neofascist when he built up part of his career pretending to ‘expose’ fascism. It’s a useful reconfirmation that anticommunist ‘antifascism’ is cosmetic at best.
Given that D’Souza has no respect for black humans, it’s only fitting that he’d respect an heir to Ethiopia’s conquerors, too.
deleted by creator