• Adlach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Literally only the Tibetan “government in exile” (formed in 2011) and the CIA hold this opinion

      • Adlach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The ROC holds that Tibet has been part of China since 1792 at latest, which is the consensus of non-PRC historians everywhere. The Qing Dynasty fully integrated Tibet, though Tibet and China had been co-ruled as part of the same country with no meaningful distinction since the 14th century.

        • Eat_Yo_Vegetables69
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          lol, say we go back in time to the Qin Dynasty to restore China’s borders to the liberal wet dream balkanisation map where only the ‘Han majority proper’ reside. It’s 200 BC and their beloved anglo empires also should vanish into dust.

          Date fixed as my drunk ass mixed up AD with BC

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Fun fact, their balkanisation maps often don’t even include the original territory of Kingdom of Qin as Chinese and/or Han. Also Qin Dynasty fallen in 206 but BC. The balkanisation maps seems to be often based on Spring and Autumn period (but with much less sense).

      • Red
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Are you fucking for real? A quick google search, even on the heavily CIA edited Wikipedia, would tell you Tibet ( which was part of the Mongolic Dzungarian empire at the time) was annexed by Qing Empire in the 1700s.