• quality_fun
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    this doesn’t mean that china has no economic issues at all. real estate, for example, must be properly managed without wiping out everyone’s investments.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think preserving investments is going to be the priority there, rather the focus will likely be on preserving jobs. What I think is most likely to happen is that large chunks of the real estate industry become nationalized.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a pretty good solution that worked many times in the past. Rich investors are going to lose some money on this, but that’s about it and frankly that’s not even a negative. Ultimately, the goal should be to remove all aspects of capitalism and move towards a true socialist economy that’s a mix of state and cooperative ownership. Doing these kinds of nationalization projects helps with the transition.

          • quality_fun
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            i would agree, but 30% or so of the gdp is in real estate. china cannot just lose a third of its economy.