Sure why not? Add to the delicious medley of microplastics and persistent organic pollutants, what could go wrong!

  • Shrike502
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is such a beautiful piece of news. Beautiful the way a hurricane is beautiful. Such a perfect combination of everything wrong

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      1. Contaminating food with semiconductors (especially food that’s expected to be heated to very high temperatures in some dishes, perfect for breaking down already non-edible chemicals into even more reactive pollutants and then actively drawing them out of the semiconductor to where it’s more readily absorbed by the intestines.) Look up some of the chemicals used to create the semiconductor effect in silicon. Arsenic is a really common one. It’s locked away in the silicon crystal and harmless when outside your body, but inside your body when exposed to the heat of cooking and then strong acid in your stomach, who knows?!

      2. Making your own product worse to own the counterfeiters. One of the biggest reasons for avoiding counterfeit food is the higher risk of contaminants, well now that the genuine product is contaminated what’s the goddamn point?

      3. Probably not preventing counterfeiters as in “they’re selling a block of flour and passing it off as cheese”, because you don’t need a chip to detect that. More like “it didn’t come from this very specific region in Italy by the established cheese monopoly, but it’s pretty much identical otherwise.” Protecting the brand and its profitability, not the consumer.

      4. Literal fucking food DRM. Remember when this used to be satire?

        • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          11 months ago

          And the chip is food safe anyway

          The food industry has used that line way too many times to be trusted.

        • redtea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think you know how this cheese works. The rind is edible. It has the strongest flavour, so it’s what’s used in sauces, etc. If you ever had parmesan in a sauce e.g. at a restaurant, you ate the rind. Hence the need to put an edible microchip in it – because people are expected to eat it.

            • redtea
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sorry for my hostility. I get upset when companies pull stunts like this. Monopoly rent on flavour is a sin.

                • moody@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Look up a Mornay sauce.

                  Basically, it’s a bechamel sauce with cheese added to it. It can be any cheese, but Parmigiano is common. Very simple to make.

                • o_d [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It’s also common when cooking at home to save the rind for soups and stews. It gives it extra umami.

          • redtea
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Cauliflower, cheddar, and parmesan soup with parmesan croutons mmm