title

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Strong moderation abilities, and instance admins like ourselves who actually ban white supremacist communities and not sit on their hands about hosting the largest one on the internet, for years.

    edit: like just today, we had a few TERF communities try to set up here. It took us less than a day to ban them. Its not difficult.

    • dizzy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      That’s good to hear, I’ve got very little idea of how the fediverse works nor how moderation works on these types of sites so thanks for clarifying. I had a look to see if c/the_donald existed and although it seems to, I could see the following:

      Make America Great Again removed by mod

      No Posts.

      Does that mean the community has been removed by a mod then or something else?

        • dizzy@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          So with the way Lemmy currently works, could someone create a community, write some hate speech in the community description and that description stays up forever?

          E: Apologies if it would have been more appropriate to ask this question in c/lemmy_support

          • Maya@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            I’m just gonna guess here, but I’m pretty sure there are manual steps an instance admin can take to nerf that stuff in the database

            • @lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Additionally, there is a plan to implement a purge feature for particularly egregious posts, but as long as these communities are not allowed to spread their roots here, there shouldn’t be much of an issue. Seeing fascists and bigots getting whacked in the mod log doesn’t bother me much at all.

              There’s nothing stopping them from setting up their own instances (like Gab did with Mastodon), but they will be ostracized from the fediverse.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shitjustworks just voted to delist exploding heads from their instance. Beehaw is not federated with two of the largest (lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works) because they are worried about bots.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 years ago

      That should probably be in the README/FAQ.
      From what I could gather in the recent Reddit thread, Lemmy becoming yet another Reddit clone that turns into a Nazi bastion is a common concern driving people away from giving the platform a chance.

    • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta say, Lemmy is both way more active and way better curated so far then other Voat or any of the other Reddit clones

    • Jassu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 years ago

      How does this work with upcoming federation features and de-centralised nature of the lemmy platform?

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        A community is still ultimately controlled by the instance where it lives, along with those admins and mods.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 years ago

            The reality is that they can already do that with plenty of existing services. Lemmy isn’t providing a new an unique opportunity for nazis to communicate that wasn’t available to them previously.

            That said, the moderation and federation rules do appear to work in practice as seen with Mastodon where similar concerns have been raised. The one nazi instance is its own bubble, and nobody federates with it.

  • sneakyninjapants@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Assuming they’re generally on the same instance ::cough EH cough:: others can just defederate if they want. Those that are harassing and spreading hate speech on mixed servers can be blocked, banned from communities, or the instance in question if egregious enough.

  • justhach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are way more of us than there are of them. Let them scream impotently into the void and hear nothing come back.

    Sure, maybe they will rally some numbers and try ti make noise, but ultimately they will just get bored and move on as things aren’t as monolithic here in the fediverse as they are on Reddit/Facebook/Twitter/etc.

  • Maya@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    A code of conduct!

    More seriously I think Mastodon’s general rejection of Gab taught us that federated software can have an immune system in the form of instance admins/mods blocking federation.

  • RaidonChrome@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Me. See, Voat ended up like it did because of the blatant bias of banning. I hope Lemmy would get all kinds of people here to stay, not just one political leaning or subset. The federation sure looks like a good solution for this, since one can simply ban a whole instance they don’t like and be done. As long as we all have an interest in Lemmy it should’t become an echo chamber.

  • Mehran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    The main thing preventing that is capturing of initial user base.

    The next part is finding a person who has some understanding psychology and know what a healthy community looks like to moderate.

    Something like a code of conduct is typically the correct way of doing things. Neither is strong moderation abilities, since almost all moderators are influenced by other users and their own opinions.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Free software is free for everyone, and innocent until proven guilty.

    Right wing people want to have reasonable discussion on their space? Fine. I am not forced to talk with them, but they can provide interesting contribution to the debate, we lack them on the fedi. Far right people want a platform for non moderated hate speech. (Luckily, I live in a place with hate speech laws) at the point it spreads over the fedi . I would move to an instance not federating them.

    That’s the cool part of the federation, just like most Masto instance do not federate with instance posting child porn, you can get rid of neo Nazi by not federating them

  • MysticDaedra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’m genuinely curious, looking to move from Reddit due to heavy-handed mod abuse and the extreme leftist bias of virtually all the big subreddits. Is Lemmy going to be a place where free speech is honored, or will conservatives always get the boot like on Reddit? I’m not talking about hate speech or calls for violence, I’m just as against that as the next person. But I’d like to know I’m not going to get banned because my opinion differed from that of a mod.

    • wraptile@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      or will conservatives always get the boot like on Reddit?

      If it stinks of shit everywhere you go then maybe it’s time to look under your shoe? 🤔

      While there’s value in conservative thought most people who subscribe to it don’t know how to exercise it.

    • concrete_baby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t understand Lemmy. Feel free to host your own instance with your conservatives views. It will likely get defederated by other instances, but nobody’s stopping you.

        • IdahoVandal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha, post age is a constant reminder that the Fediverse wasn’t getting much action for a long time. I don’t even know how many replies I’ve posted then noticed the age.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “active” and “hot” feeds are kind of broken. Clearly configured with the lower post volume in mind. I suggest top>day until it’s fixed.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As long as you’re not hateful in the way you show it, conservatism is not always inherently evil. Just sadly the further you go to the right the more hateful you become to the rest of the world.

      Not all conservatives are bad. But the kind that spout MAGA and long for Boris’ return are usually in that camp.

      I feel like most lemmy admins (at least on sh.itjust.works, from what I can tell) are quite lenient as long as what you office isn’t winning towards harming or hating on another group of people

      (Just to clarify to others, I am not a conservative, I’m very left leaning socially with some authoritarian views on certain governmental issues. But I also understand that not all conservatives are our enemy, we talk about them always ending up in echo chambers and ending up being more radicalised by doing so. I also don’t want the left to start creating their own echo chambers by proxy. Debating is very productive in my opinion, you learn more about your own arguments and whether or not deep down if you still feel that way, while also seeing the point of view from the other side which in turn can often shed light on the real issue all of it stems from. Depending on the context of the debate obviously)

    • adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      The whole point of federation is that instead of joining a single centralized service, you’re joining the federation by joining a specific instance or creating your own instance. If you feel moderators on a certain instance are being heavy-handed you have the option to use a different instance which can still communicate with that other instance.

      As the network topology is completely different on a federated platform, moderation actually happens in two layers; instance-to-user and instance-to-instance. Instances each have their own codes of conduct, which users on that specific instance are expected to respect. On top of that, instances also have the ability to block (defederate) with other instances if it is seen as necessary for the protection of the users of that instance.

      You may be interested in how this works in practice on Mastodon. Mastodon.social, the flagship instance, has a code of conduct and a list of blocked instances along with - importantly - the reason they are blocked. As you will notice, not one of those instances is blocked for “different opinions” but rather for harassment and illegal content.

      Further reading https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/12/20691957/mastodon-decentralized-social-network-gab-migration-fediverse-app-blocking