• BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Derler said many senior executives simply have not had time to evaluate the actual costs of large-scale AI deployment or to determine which roles can realistically be automated. Implementing AI infrastructure – hardware, data systems, and security frameworks – requires major capital spending. These costs often exceed early projections, forcing management teams to reconsider the actual return on investment relative to retaining skilled employees.

    And good leadership is laying off employees, disrupting their lives and potentially jeopardizing your ability to successfully run your business before running these calculations? How is it that late-stage capitalism is contradicting its own propaganda to a pathological degree but we’re still somehow stuck with it?

      • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Doubly unfair because if anyone should be replaced with AI, it’s the ones at the top. The system would still be bullshit but at least performance evaluations would be a lot nicer.

        • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not even AI, their roles just shouldn’t exist.

          Literally their entire existence is a net negative. The porks are a literal bottleneck to getting people jobs, getting work done, etc. We can’t do anything cool because the porks don’t want to spend money even if it stabilizes profit. These bastards literally only want money for the sake of having it and lording over others.

          Nothing cool happens and we will go extinct because some of the most weak-willed decadent pigmen want to stroke their dicks.

      • FloridaBoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve personally witnessed leadership basically say “AI is good enough” even when it is clearly shitty. The most replaceable jobs are clearly theirs and not the ones that require accuracy, completeness, and thinking