• Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    18 hours ago

    sounds good for them but i wonder where russia would get all that rice considering 700 tons is literally their entire annual production

    • Comprehensive49
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      According to the USDA, Russia produced 1,185,000 tons of rice in 2024-2025.

      On other words, if this bullshit is true, Russia has promised the DPRK 70% of its annual rice production. Very reasonable /s.

      • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        that gave me a bit of whiplash cause i used the same source; i’m not sure what the difference between ‘milled’ and ‘rough’ production is and which a food-aid or food-trade deal would involve. technically 70 tons of milled would be leftover from the figure i used but ‘literally’ is a word that can contain <10% inaccuracy soviet-playful

        • Comprehensive49
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          The source lists yield in thousand tons. I think you forgot to tack on those three extra zeros.

          Raw rice grains are made up of a white grain surrounded by a bran and inedible husk. Rice is milled to remove the husk to make brown rice. It can be milled more to remove the bran to make white rice. Obviously, this process will cause the rice grains to lose ~30% weight, reducing the milled yield weight from the raw yield weight.

          I think your choice of 700,000 tons for Russia’s total edible yield makes more sense. If Russia gave the DPRK raw rice, the DPRK would have to mill it all anyways.

          Either way, this supposed deal is very silly. Russia barely grows any rice, and this list says the DPRK actually grows more rice than Russia.

          Perhaps the propagandist misspelled wheat as rice?

  • 小莱卡
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Never forget that quisling Korea sent upwards of 300,000 troops to Vietnam. Pure projection right here

  • loathsome dongeaterMA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think there is any magnitude of assistance DPRK could provide to Russia that would justify this price.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Indeed, however I would expect that Russia would want to restore relations to the levels they were at during the Soviet times. DPRK was a major industrial hub for USSR, and given that Russian economy is now running hot, they will likely be interested in leveraging the industrial base in DPRK and the skilled workforce.

      • REEEEvolution
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Ammo does not have a infinite shelf life tho. Artilery grenades can be stored for two to three decades at the most.