• stink
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Bro found out he was the side piece 😭

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    seeing how the west responded to the humanitarian crises in the middle east; and then watching the respond to ukraine; and then gaza has been re-affirming at our attitudes towards the world.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The West created/supported the humanitarian crises in the first place as well. The bombing out of Lebanon, the War on Iraq, starving Yemen, couping Libya, and supplying, training, and working with various anti-government groups in Syria, including Daesh.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve said the reason we don’t fafo with DPRK is because they have nukes.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The US can’t shoot down missiles for Ukraine because “Russia has nuclear weapons”? Do they even put in any effort for these excuses?

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        But it’s shooting down missiles. America is already supplying the missiles for Ukraine to strike Russia with. Which is far more agressive

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It is a reasonable red line: if US personnel are explicitly entering the war, Russia and the US are now explicitly at war. Being at war means the US becomes a target, that Russia could, say, blow up THAAD in Israel and destroy the “secret” US base and Daesh training grounds in Jordan and Syria. At some point, nukes become relevant.

          Do you think war between Russia and the US is a good thing?