• farmer_of_song
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-4/mswv4_65.htm

    As the other poster says, define democracy.

    Exploring Communist, read: statist, notions of what democracy is as well as what Western notions of democracy is, especially in the context of multiculturalism is at least an interesting angle.

    The United States is democratic by its own definition, and China isn’t democratic by American definitions. China is democratic by its own definition, and the United States isn’t democratic by Chinese definitions (look up bourgeois democracy).

    This is a more interesting angle than simply arguing that China is a democracy by Western definitions, and if you have time, you can also consider Iran.

    • farmer_of_song
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole-process_people's_democracy

      Wikipedia can’t be cited, but you can always steal its sources.

      Whole process people’s democracy

      https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202403/03/content_WS65e47e91c6d0868f4e8e494c.html https://archive.is/FNP6x#selection-423.0-426.0

      IIRC, the Chinese were exploring similar processes to the Singaporeans, who also have a one-party state (except theirs is a cross between social democracy and fascism, as opposed to a cross between classic AES and social democracy). This employs the use of polling, surveys, and focus groups to constantly investigate what the people want, and put it into consideration for policy decisions.

      Another buzz word in China is the mass line, so if you don’t have time or can’t extend the scope to compare and contrast different countries’ definitions of democracy, you can simply explore how the notion of democracy has evolved in China from Sun Yatsen (Sun Yixian) to Xi Jinping, and how China, mostly, lives up to its own definition of democracy.

      • MeowZedong
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wikipedia can’t be cited, but you can always steal its sources.

        True, and this will work for a school paper (teachers and professors never check sources because there are too many), but you should critically look at all the sources they use as well. Many of them are not only unsupportive, but actually support the opposite of what they are cited for. Science, politics, and history.