White Chauvinist Maoist. I’m as surprised as you are. This dude needs to seriously stfu about black liberation movements.
Wow this guy is deranged
ok…
Cubans assisting Angola in their war against white supremacist aggressors? Heroically? AGAINST IMPOSED APARTHEID? Those fucking revisionist, SOCIAL IMPERIALIST bastards!
Seriously, hope this guy eats lead (the ore in Minecraft).
Maoists are seriously something else, just yesterday one told me that Kim Il Sung was bad because he was not a Korean just a Soviet plant and even worse because in 1956 he purged a r.e.a.l. Korean communists, (who just happened to be the chinese and soviet factions in DPRK)…
Like how you would even fucking talk with such people?
Didn’t a Khrushchevite faction and a Chinese faction try to oust him? They called him bad for stopping a coup? Also I hope Mao had nothing to do with that move since that kinda sheds new light on the whole “ally with the first world against the second” thing they had going on.
Yes, they linked some cracker ultra article when it was said that there was no proof for any coup, and it was he who couped the legimate communists and installed his cronies.
In reality he was called to Moscow where Khrushchev did probably that characteristic mix of high horse sermon, shameless fawning and open threats he usually say when speaking in person with other socialist leaders. I guess Kim did a good face for bad game there since he did returned from there* but in the meantime khrushchevite faction prepared a coup against him, but Kim outmaneuvered them and purged them in two or three rounds.
Unfortunately Mao most probabaly took part in it, chinese faction joined the khrushchevites in the coup attempt and were purged together with them.
The most crazy westmaoist moment is not even using cracker sources, that’s the norm for them, but complaining about Kim successfully doing revolution with soviet help (they would probably want to see maoist protracted baby boiling for decades in unified but occupied Korea instead, look how fine that went in the south) and then complaining he ousted foreign factions and gained full soverignity. Except that some usual blabbering about juche being full revisionism and not being ML in any way.
He also previously say that Duterte regime in Philippines is holding only on direct USA help and when that disappear, it wil immediately fall to huge nationwide communist revolution.
*For example polish president Bierut didn’t had so much luck and returned from Moscow in 1956 in coffin. He wasn’t necessarily murdered since his health was ailing at the time, but entire thing is highly suspicious. Bierut was known for being hardcore ML and both personal and national ally of Stalin, and after his death coup occured where ML’s were purged and nationalists risen, lead by Gomułka, guy who at the time of Bierut death was under house arrest for “right nationalist deviation”.
*For example polish president Bierut didn’t had so much luck and returned from Moscow in 1956 in coffin. He wasn’t necessarily murdered since his health was ailing at the time, but entire thing is highly suspicious. Bierut was known for being hardcore ML and both personal and national ally of Stalin, and after his death coup occured where ML’s were purged and nationalists risen, lead by Gomułka, guy who at the time of Bierut death was under house arrest for “right nationalist deviation”.
Wait so even after the exact same thing happened in Hungary after the ousting of Rakosi, Nagy fumbling the bag so far left he appointed nazi collaborators freed from prison to command the military into a fascist coup, Khrushchev did it again in Poland after Hungary fractured the international communist movement? How the hell did he make it to the 60s? All of this tells me the DPRK will spearhead the global revolution lmao
Kim Il-sung was honestly, imo, one of if not the greatest liberator(s) of all time. Fought with the Soviets in WW2, the CPC, and the WPK. Defended Korea not only from Japanese invaders but Western and predominantly Amerikan invaders, and defended Korean socialism from commandist Soviet and Chinese lines. Laid the groundwork for a perpetual motion machine of ideological commitment to socialism that will last generation after generation. Absolute hero and any shitlib who claims Koreans in the north “worship him” or whatever needs to have a long look in the mirror at their own society’s unceasing hard-on for literal slave-owners. If you’re gonna have national heroes, you can’t do much better than comrade Kim Il-sung.
Don’t they hold the record for highest amount of military support any socialist country has given to imperialized nations? Or is it just the highest number of times a socialist country has given military support to imperialized nations
Poland was earlier than Hungary. 20th congress was in february, Bierut died 12 march. his death sparked conflict between “stalinist” and opportunists factions in Poland (younger members of the latter faction became later open traitors like Mieczysław Rakowski or Józef “No food” Olszewski, there were also a lot of former PPS succdems).
After Bierut died Edward Ochab was elected for 1st secretary of PZPR, he was seen as neutral but later suppored the opportunists.
In the meantime in june 1956 general strike happened in Poland, with almost sure foreign involvement, with the brutal riots in Poznań directly provoked by unknown people (absolutely no coincidence with international fair happening at the moment in city /s). This caused Ochab to change the front and the rise of Gomułka. Ultimately Gomułka was elected I secretary in 21 october, and in 23 october hungarian counterrevolution begun. I have no doubt those were connected in some way, which would however point rather on west than on Khrushchev meddling in june 1956 and trying to win something on the power struggle in the socialist bloc.
So it’s the same as in 1989, Poland was seen as the most opportunist country of entire bloc and first balloon to test the regime change. Interestingly enough the same almost happened in 1980-81 when KPSU was in disarray because internal maneuvers after Brezhniev health was failing. Massive strikes incited by CIA, church and opportunists started with probable goal of checking if the Brezhniev Doctrine still stands. If not, massive wave of regime change attempts would follow. Fortunately general Jaruzelski enacted martial law and crushed more violent provocateurs so the BD was not challenged, and the next atempt had to wait few years to perestroika.
Poland really do be a state of mind fr
I feel people like this post say ridiculous shit like this because they are addicted to the response they get by causing outrage
“In all their propaganda and agitation—both within parliament and outside it—the Communist parties must consistently expose that constant violation of the equality of nations and of the guaranteed rights of national minorities which is to be seen in all capitalist countries, despite their “democratic” constitutions. It is also necessary, first, constantly to explain that only the Soviet system is capable of ensuring genuine equality of-nations, by uniting first the proletarians and then the whole mass of the working population in the struggle against the bourgeoisie; and, second, that all Communist parties should render direct aid to the revolutionary movements among the dependent and underprivileged nations (for example, Ireland, the American Negroes, etc.) and in the colonies.”
If you’re not supporting self determination and not providing material aid in their struggle for freedom how the fuck are you gonna get them to join your movement? Why is he quoting Lenin? He’s doing the “ummmm acktually sweaty” libshit from this ML aesthetic. This woman just through her lived experiences as a member of a colonized nation can understand and communicate Lenin’s writings on the subject better than some dork who’s just quote mining so he can win online arguments with his old Mao pfp
- V. I. Lenin, Draft Theses on National and Colonial Questions For The Second Congress Of The Communist International, 5 June 1920
Quote mining Lenin for arguments for ukonazis is totally scumbag but pretty common. Quoting Lenin against black people is just wew, i don’t remember Lenin ever mentioning them, both in US or Africa, without explicitly condemning exploitation and colonisation of them.
But please don’t tell me he thought black hundreds were black people… that would be like ultraturbocrackolefto9000
