Depends. A good chunk of non-tankies want to nuke Russia. They think that any degree of Russian involvement in east Ukraine is “meddling” whereas American intervention and regime change is white man’s burden. For normal people there was this good article that was recently published: https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/civil-war-in-donbass-10-years-on
tbf I have issued a fair number of bans and removals with the reason “liberalism”![emoji side-eye-1 side-eye-1](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/1cbb04a6-ba97-4c28-af8e-acf9c9fb0416.png)
at least liberalism is reasonably well-defined
It is but mostly for us. People operate on the basis of their ground truths. This moderator probably thinks that the shelling of Dobass is a hoax because of shit like this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_have_you_been_for_eight_years%3F
Meanhile they will chastise you for denying the supposed Uyghur genocide. A genocide with no comfirmed kills.
Not trying to apoligise for this dipshit. Just wanted to say that modlog messages will often not be verbose due to laziness or convenience.
sure, although I’m not sure they can give a non-vague definition of “tankie”
maybe “person who disagrees with US foreign policy” if they have enough self awareness
Yeah. Tankie is someone who is to the left of New York Times on US foreign policy.
Are there any good resources to show non-tankies about this, by the way?
Depends. A good chunk of non-tankies want to nuke Russia. They think that any degree of Russian involvement in east Ukraine is “meddling” whereas American intervention and regime change is white man’s burden. For normal people there was this good article that was recently published: https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/civil-war-in-donbass-10-years-on