• laziestflagellant [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s funny. If you asked any of these AI hyping effective altruists if a calculator ‘understands’ what numbers mean or if a video game’s graphic engine ‘understands’ what a tree is, they’d obviously say no, but since this chunky excessive calculator’s outputs are words instead of numbers or textured polygons suddenly its sapient.

          • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 month ago

            AI bros are the absolute worst.

            When I was in college, for one of my classes, one of our assignments was to use a circuit design language to produce a working, Turing-complete computer from basic components like 1-bit registers and half-adders. It really takes the mystique out of computation and you really see just how basic and mechanical computers are at their core: you feed signals into input lines, then the input gets routed, stored, and/or output depending on a handful of deterministic rules. At its core, every computer is doing the same thing that basic virtual computer did, just with more storage, bit width, predefined operations, and fancier ways to render its output. Once you understand that, the idea of a computer “becoming self-aware and altering its programming” is just ludicrous.

    • facow [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      We love Chinese rooms don’t we folks?

      Just one more filing cabinet of instructions and we’ll be done building god. I’m sure of it

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “It still has bugs”

    Then why have you implemented it before it’s safe to do so? Shit like this would get most things recalled or sued back in the day for endangering people with false information.

    Capitalism is totally off it’s rocket

  • Water Bowl Slime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t that what food photographers do to make pizza cheese look stretchier? The bot should recommend nailing the pizza slice down to the table next lol

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ok I understand how the AI got this one wrong. You can make a “glue” by mixing flour and water together. You can also thicken a sauce by adding flour. So the AI just jumbled it all up into this. In its dataset, it’s got “flour + water = non toxic glue”. However, adding flour to a sauce, which contains water, also thickens the sauce. So in the AI’s world, this makes perfect sense. Adding the"non toxic glue" to the sauce will make it thicker.

    This just shows how unintelligent so called “Artificial Intelligence” actually is. It reasons like a toddler. It can’t actually think for itself, all it can do is try link things that it thinks are relevant to the query from it’s dataset.