• Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hot fuzz. Because the first watch is enjoyable, but every subsequent rewatch makes you appreciate Edgar Wright more and more. He is just the most incredibly meticulous story teller with the most dense movies.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Memento.

    Though, being real, I would say that it’s a movie that gets more interesting on second watch rather than being one out need to watch twice to get. I honestly haven’t ever run across a movie like that.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not OP, but to me it’s one where getting to the ending gives you the context/lense to reinterpret the earlier portions. Sorta like memento or fight club, where the ending recontextualizes the earlier scenes.

    • 🐋 Color 🔱 ♀@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I had to pause that movie several times on my first watching. Not because it was bad or anything, it was amazing, but because there was so much stuff going on at once. It’s now one of my fave movies to recommend to people

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        One of my favorite things i caught in a second watch was a simple thing, but i really liked the little touch they did to drive home the different realities they jumped thru. Did you notice the music playing in the car when theyre talking? Its a country version of “absolutely” -madding crowd. It also explains why short round ends up quoting the lyrics when he tries to explain how weird reality has become. It’s not just a funny call out, it fits.

        I really liked that little touch. There are many like that, and the film is well worth rewatching to catch them

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 months ago

    Donnie Darko. Besides being confusing, it’s just a great story. Plus, it’s remarkably well cast.

    If you have the opportunity to watch the deleted scenes, I highly recommend it - especially the one with the dad. His role in the cinematic version is pretty small, but there’s a deleted scene where he has a quiet chat with Donnie, and tells Donnie about his past mental problems. It’s fantastic, and rounds out his character perfectly.

      • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Did you watch the theatrical or directors cut? The latter explains a LOT more.

        TL;DW If I remember it all correctly. The plane crash caused a “Final Destination”-esque rift in spacetime? Or fate? Or reality? And Donnie should have died, but didn’t and because he didn’t the universe will implode unless he fixes it in time by dying. He also gains powers to see the future as part of the deal (represented by the weird trails in front of people walking) and he realizes the future is everything ending unless he dies to seal up the rift. Frank, the bunny is like a guide or messenger or something.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Y’know I don’t mind the “spoiler” because the realistic likelihood of watching this one feels kinda slim…

          … But this sounds like a far better version of The Butterfly Effect, which was one of the most pointlessly edgy, pathetically nihilistic, manipulatively depressing films I’ve had the displeasure of seeing.

          • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I saw that in theaters and it was one of the maybe two movies I’ve walked out of. It was so pointlessly depressing and just not enjoyable to us so we bailed.

            Donnie is much better. Depressing? Yeah in a way, but also much more engaging and enjoyable.

            • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m so happy for you, that you managed to only see part of it and cut and run lol. We saw it on DVD and the folks were so convinced it was a thriller that was gonna pay off in the end (like it was marketed, frankly)…ooof.

              It doesn’t get better, and you can probably infer from my comment what the main character’s “revelation to fix things” was. (Apparently there were other endings)

              If film is a communication medium, this one is more a cry for help than anything else. (I felt the same about a certain mega-popular decade-long anime that just concluded with similar empty-nihilistic ideas, but that’s another topic lol.)

              Who knows, I see Donnie making a lot of lists, so I just might, when I feel I can handle it. :)

              Gloomy cinema aside, I hope you’re having a great week. :) hahaha

        • Trollivier@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t remember honestly. I remember having to read about the movie too kinda almost understand it.

          Thanks for the explanation, now I probably have to watch it again :)

    • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is that in the director’s cut? I tend to recommend the theatrical cut. I don’t find it confusing but I can understand how it might be possible to get lost if you miss a key scene or two.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t know. It deserves to be.

        I used to have a DVD of the theatrical cut, which I got before I even knew a director’s cut existed.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I like how this movie’s fanbase is split on a group of people recommending the theatrical cut and another group recommending the Director’s Cut. I haven’t found another movie that has something similar.

        • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s been a long time since I saw the director’s cut. Having read the comment above about what the director’s cut includes I’m more inclined to continue recommending the theatrical cut. The magic of that story and it’s characters doesn’t need more exposition, especially about the fantastical elements. It’s enough to know that Donnie figure’s stuff out and takes decisive action with the knowledge he and by extension the audience has at hand.

    • Alsjemenou@lemy.nl
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      One of my favourites for sure. I just love the struggle the character has for what is and what isn’t reality in that movie.

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Big Lebowski. I’ve never seen another movie gain so much value over time and rewatches

    • cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      SPOILER ALERT-- do not read further if you haven’t seen the movie.


      When my husband is being a jerk, I tell him I want the other brother back, the one who loves me.

      • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        By the way, you can use spoiler tags on Lemmy!

        ::: spoiler This is a spoiler
        Now the movie is ruined!
        :::
        
        This is a spoiler

        Now the movie is ruined!

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think she really could know. She is definitely suspicious but it’s such a hard conclusion to jump to without any reason to think it.

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Yeah i agree. It fascinates me though. So many of her statements could be read more than one way after knowing the trick.

            I dunno if it even matters to the story, but all the makeup in the world wouldnt hide your husband’s identity from you, right? Not someone you knew for years. And she’s the only one who saw his hand fresh after the ‘surgery’. I like to wonder about what exactly she suspected, and what she meant when she said she couldn’t live this way.

            I look for clues every time. Still not sure (or if you’re supposed to know) which person loved her or if either of them know who the OG was.

            • pyr0ball@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Having had a partner who gaslit and had basically a personality disorder, I could absolutely see someone getting driven to do what she did. You start to doubt your own ability to distinguish reality, to be able to trust yourself or anyone else. Constant fear and anxiety will make anyone go a little nuts

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think if I was in her shoes there’s no way I’d figure it out unless it was super obvious. It’s way too unreal and it contradicts occam’s razor.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      A few weeks ago, I finally saw this for the first time, knowing virtually nothing about the plot. WOW. I’m looking forward to watching it again!

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    Snatch.

    There’s like 15 main characters. Every scene is important but it is impossible for it all to be apparent on a first watch.

    It’s really brilliant storytelling. Watching Lock To k & Two Smoking barrels, you realize that guy Ritchie might be a one trick pony. But that’s okay, it’s a great trick.

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Big Lebowski. You pick up on stuff with each watch, and it just gets funnier when you do.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Perfect example. Almost all of the dude’s lines are things he heard a scene or two before.

      There’s so many things foreshadowed in the movie that you’d only catch the second or third time around.

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The Sixth Sense, if you can go into it blind. I’m usually pretty good at figuring out a movie’s plot twist, but this one caught me completely by surprise. Then when you watch it again you pick up on all the dropped hints.

    • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I recognized the twist at a certain conversation early in the movie. It’s not really hidden, or at least not well.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I figured out the twist within like the first 5 minutes of my first watch (nobody spoiled it for me, but I knew that there would be a twist and was looking for one) and it made the movie pretty boring imo

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Mulholland Drive. I get… angry at myself when i don’t understand a film that i know has a hidden meaning i can’t grasp so i watched it 4 times until i finally understood it. Now i am complete

  • UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shutter island watches completely differently on the second watch, same with Primer, The usual suspects, and Moon (2009).

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    2001: A Space Odyssey

    It’s my favorite because of the cinematography and atmosphere. It’s my favorite because of the themes and philosophy. It’s my favorite because space and psychedelia are cool.

    It’s just an all around great movie if you can appreciate the slow pacing and intentionally jarring or tense aspects that drag on. 30 minutes of monkeys fucking around for seemingly no reason (at least, at first). Discordant wailing that lasts so long it nearly leaves your ears ringing. Space shots with no sound at all, or just the hissing of the space suit, which linger on the slow drift of a character moving from one location to the next. A character begging for his life as another dismantles his brain bit-by-bit.

    To me, this movie always flys by, and it always feels like i was there in it, fully immersed. To my friends, it lasts a week and has one cool part that took an eon to get to.

    Also it begs for multiple watchings to develop a theory of what the fuck is happening at the end and what the obelisk is and where it comes from.

    It also raises philosophical questions that are interesting to come up with and grapple with in new ways with each viewing. Is HAL alive? Whats the next leap in evolution? can uncomfortable art be good? Who owns the moon? How did consciousness evolve? What’s happening to Dave?

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        it truly is, especially visually. The vfx are incredible for any time. And I’m not ever talking about the ending, which is mostly just film-editing; I’m talking about the space scenes that actually feel like space, or the scene where frank makes a complete loop running through the ship, or the zero g scene when the space age is first introduced. That’s all astounding, and it boggles the mind to think how they achieved that with practical fx

        And this was made around the time of the original Star Trek and before Star Wars.

        Its prescience is a whole other layer on top of that. It was obviously influenced by the space race and how that captured the public imagination: what will we find on the moon? Will we have a moon colony? Will we have commuter class space travel? What’s next, travelling to another planet? Will computers be sentient?

        And lo and behold, they were only about 25 years off with some guesses. And it’s looking more and more likely that the rest are coming down the pipe.

    • winnie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did you watch second part, 2010: The Year We Make Contact? Really like quality of effects.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I did not, but you’re also the first person I’ve met who liked it. Does it add much to the original?

        • winnie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It explains why HAL got mad. To be honest I never watch original in full. Started watching and got bored. But watched 2010 in one go. I don’t know why. It was inspiration to watch it after I saw this film mentioned in one YT video.

          I liked that it touch topic of war between US and USSR. And I really enjoyed quality of Practical Effects.

    • ianovic69@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a really good summary. Such a ground breaking film, good shout for this post.