50,000? thems rookie numbers.
Been writing code for a good while. Will probably continue writing code for a while longer.
50,000? thems rookie numbers.
linamp really whips the penguin’s ass!
let the makeshift rafts filled with refugees begin.
not so much for understanding but, fight club is a different movie the second time around.
do it often. you may end up with 150 conflicts to have to wade through.
fond memories for BeOS
basically, ticks are fishing from the low brush and grass. they hang around with their “hooks” out waiting for something to wander by where their hair or fur snags on the tick’s hooks and away they go!
unless you inherit a large base written by someone who is bad at it where their approach seemed to be to write new bad rules in attempt to cover up previous bad rules and so on. we all know how supportive employers are at addressing technical debt. (site redesign cant come soon enough)
hoping homeworld 3 is good as well.
eterm because I’m old skool. now get off my lawn.
“algorithm” is a little too fine grained for what you describe. “software design patterns” is probably what you are looking for.
unfortunately, not all projects call out the patterns they employ.
PICNIC. problem in chair, not in computer.
here is somewhat less:
return (number % 2) == 0;
just tell them there is a black man at the moment of theft, they will get on it lickety split!
most are just pedophile rings anyway.
schrute-bucks would have a higher exchange rate.
why not just open the door and look?
making them better would mean more work, stress and ill conceived requirements for the programmers. I’m more in favor of marketing thrashing about on their own.