• comrade-bear
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    What in the hell is the source for this? Plus those studies are usually messed up by people not choosing to participate if they think they’ll be embarrassed by it

      • comrade-bear
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thank you, but still leaves me wondering for the source of the data in the image, even though it answers where the image comes from

        • davel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I sure don’t know, but I’m almost certain this is lipstick on a pig.

      • CITRUS
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Literally it seems in this case 🙃

  • Tarkov_Survivor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    In Ecuador, the largest commonly available condoms are the brand “five” in their “XL” presentation, these condoms are designed for 19cm of length. So yeah maybe it’s possible that we have the biggest dicks but if this is supposed to be an average then - shouldn’t we have some larger condoms available more commonly?

    Why is there no consideration for girth? Where does this data come from?

    I’ll offer this link for information on our largest commonly available condoms, if you’d like to contribute to a more serious data collection effort perhaps you could provide similar information for condoms in your party of the world?

    https://www.rappi.com.ec/p/condones-five-xl-230053

  • DamarcusArt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does this measure growers vs showers? Is this self-reported or a medical examination? And why is it in inches when the majority of the world uses centimetres? Nothing about this adds up at all.