• wtry@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Are you denying that Google is a repository of information. Even duckduckgo is banned. They’re not even close to a monopoly. I’m making the point that they’re restricting information. Also I’d be happy to read article 590 if you could provide me with an English translation.

    • CriticalResist8MA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      how is banning Google restricting information and why did you not touch on the State Council report about the 1989 Beijing protests?

      Since there is an edit: you can OCR the document and run it into an online translator. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China writes, understandably, in Chinese.

      • wtry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was wondering if something like that would lose some meaning as things like that are infamously inaccurate.

        • CriticalResist8MA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          3 months ago

          Would you trust a human-made translation if someone made it? The only people that would care enough to go through the document and manually translate it would be Marxist-Leninists who want to prove a point. I doubt Maoists for example, who consider the Deng government revisionist, would take the time to translate a document that vindicates the 1989 government.