Lugansk: 100%
Kherson: 94.3%
Zaporozhye: 72.49%
Donetsk: 60.29%
Kharkiv: 33.15%
Nikolaevskaya: 4.83%

Source

  • Kind_Stone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Don’t forget that the force used by Russia in the operation is severely limited. Can’t recall the exact numbers, but they were like 1:1 or a tad less than the Ukrainian regular military at the beginning of the operation in February. Such numbers are not good for a full scale advance assault. Gotta play tactics and strategy for a long time to reduce the Ukrainian military substentially to make further assault operations viable.

      • Kind_Stone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Some people might be dancing and jerking off to the supposed “military strength” of our modern military, but it is painfully apparent on the inside how things really are. Especially since most of us undergo military service.

        The material base is almost non-existent. It got better in recent 5 years, but it is still damn bad. Economically army is in shambles. The soldiers who signed the contract are not numerous enough for double numbers and if the regular temp-service troops are sent there - it will be a giant fucking explosion of unrest.

        So no. We can’t afford to send double of the already fighting troops. And no, double the numbers wouldn’t really steamroll anything, only increase the already substential losses.

        • Kirbywithwhip1987
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          So bad situation unfortunately, my brother told me that it would be over in a few weeks, that Russia would take S-400, modern Katyushas, Su planes or whatnot and just decimate Ukraine and nazis, if only were that easy…