The 87% is from the US latest estimate of 315,000 casualties. This lines up fairly well with Ukrainian reports, as well as UK, and AUS reports. Fortunately burn pits are hard to hide from satellite imagery.
Unfortunately my access to these images is limited due to the sensitive nature of the military optics involved, however in the future, the ICC will judiciate these war crimes, and the evidence will likely see public eyes.
This really depends on the war/conflict being discussed, but generally speaking the US’s global policy is to support democracy and the humane treatment of humans. Respecting this general stance, it’s easy to back Ukraine in a defensive manor, protecting the sovereign control from foreign Russian aggression.
Fuck, I remember you now, you’re that fucker who made it like two comments into defending that ridiculous thesis a few months ago before turning around and crying to some other instance that I said something that I plainly didn’t. I don’t remember exactly what it was. I think I discussed the DPRK, but there was something else to it too.
Source: “intelligence agencies” that you don’t even name or provide a link to
Evidence: it’s all been burned and so doesn’t exist. The fact the evidence doesn’t exist is proof that it’s true.
The 87% is from the US latest estimate of 315,000 casualties. This lines up fairly well with Ukrainian reports, as well as UK, and AUS reports. Fortunately burn pits are hard to hide from satellite imagery.
Link me something about these satellite images that show “burn pits”
Unfortunately my access to these images is limited due to the sensitive nature of the military optics involved, however in the future, the ICC will judiciate these war crimes, and the evidence will likely see public eyes.
So what you’re saying is that some people claim there are photos? Then the evidence isn’t photos but testimony until those photos are produced
Just like how the ICC got cold feet after Isisrael was reported to the ICC by South Africa because
Wait so in your concept of this war, you see the US as a disinterested neutral observer?
Putler woke up one day and his omelette was burnt slightly, so he ordered the sacking of Kiev.
Honestly understandable sometimes its the smallest thing that sets you off, could see myself doing the same
This really depends on the war/conflict being discussed, but generally speaking the US’s global policy is to support democracy and the humane treatment of humans. Respecting this general stance, it’s easy to back Ukraine in a defensive manor, protecting the sovereign control from foreign Russian aggression.
This is a bit?
As in a 1 or a 0? Generally speaking quantum dynamics dictates a gray area is more in line with today’s reasoning.
Goddamn it
No need to be hostile, please refrain from the use of language, it doesn’t promote thoughtful debate.
01001111 01101000 00100000 01100100 01100001 01101101 01101110 00100000 01101101 01100010
Fuck, I remember you now, you’re that fucker who made it like two comments into defending that ridiculous thesis a few months ago before turning around and crying to some other instance that I said something that I plainly didn’t. I don’t remember exactly what it was. I think I discussed the DPRK, but there was something else to it too.
ZENZ ZENZ ZENZ
Are you okay? Your record may be zkipping.
LMAO. Thanks for the laughs at least.
You dont know who zenz is huh?
Loser
So zero unaligned sources.
You’re welcome to cite alternatives! I’ll hear your arguments!
You’re the one making the claim, dipshit.