I wouldn’t think so, because the most important part of the definition is to show the characteristics of said population that it defines. And I don’t see any material difference between a retirement with or without stocks, it is still just a retirement. Differently from when the retirement plan on somebody is getting a property and renting it out, then the person is in a position of landlord, they have control over selling the property and rising or lowering the rent, so they can directly affect the people that sends the money to theme. While the stock it really works much more like another form of compensation rather than any sort of control over any part of and mean of production.