• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    CNN is mostly factual, and is left-biased. It’s not a great site or channel. If you want minimal bias and highly factual reporting, you have to go with independent groups like Reuters.

    Lol, “lib brained”. I’m an anarchist, and have been for decades.

    • cfgaussianOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Reuters

      Lol, you are really just digging your hole deeper and deeper aren’t you? What next are you going to say VoA and RFA are credible sources? Are you going to cite EUvsDisinfo to show how we tankies are all secretly right wing Putin loving conspiracy theorists?

      You are embarrassing yourself. Maybe try reading the article linked in this post and you will see it actually cites sources such as the New York Times, the Economist, Business Insider and the Telegraph, since you like “reputable” mainstream media outlets so much.

      I’m an anarchist

      Is anarchist just another word for larpy liberal?

    • cfgaussianOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Calling Reuters an “independent group” is absolutely hilarious, seeing as it is a known tool of the Anglo-American intelligence agencies for spreading disinformation and facilitating regime change operations. It doesn’t get much more in bed with CIA and MI6 short of literally being a direct cutout. Oh and would you look at that, they are even funded by the NED, just like Bellingcat.

      Crazy how the fingerprints of the US deep state are all over the media sources that you consider “minimally biased and highly factual”, huh?