Um, I am not sure how I feel about this. Why would Xi support a two-state solution? Isn’t it more justified to have a one-state solution and return all of the land to the Palestinians? Won’t a two-state solution eventually lead us back to another genocide? This feels off. I did not expect Xi to make such a statement.

  • albigu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m surprised people here are still surprised at China taking a “”“middle-ground”“” stance on geopolitical issues that don’t directly impact them.

    A huge part of their foreign policy since the 90s has been a philosophy of “don’t stir the hornets nest” and even though that seems to be changing now that they’ve become an economic superpower, they stil don’t intervene too much where they don’t need to. Ignoring whether it’s moral or not, it’s rooted in pragmatism for their own survival first.

    • ImnecomradeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’m still learning, and I believe new people that come here will likely ask similar repeated questions. We’re all at different stages. I appreciate everyone’s perspective from this post, and I believe we have had some really good discussions and points that has already helped me grow.

      • albigu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Fair enough, sometimes I forget about that. Being from the Global South myself we constantly have this debate because China really doesn’t do much to help revolutions against states they have deals with (as opposed to earlier China or USSR), so probably feels more obvious to me than it actually is.

        Your question was fine, I was knee-jerky, don’t feel discouraged to ask more in the future.

        Edit: Also, besides what others have said about China following UN decisions, them supporting a two-state solution is fundamentally different from Western countries which provide aid for Israel also backing that. The first can pass as ineffective, naïve or disinterested, but the second is downright hypocritical by pretending they have no agency on what their colony does.