I barely remember 2010, but I remember Scott Pilgrim being to hipsters like Fight Club and American Psycho are to incels; They totally missed the point of the movie, thought it was aspirational, and the results in dive bars and shitty venues across America (maybe just the midwest?) were disastrous.

Was this real? Did I mandela effect it from the negative zone or something? Am I just getting old?

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone I hung out with loved the movie, but nobody missed that Scott is a disastrous human being. The movie actually insists that no, you cannot just weasel your way out of problems with the Power of Love, you have to learn Self-Respect so that you can also respect others and acknowledge your role in creating the current situation before you can move on.

    And of course, the gag where “Nega-Scott” is actually a really good guy… because regular Scott is terrible. The movie is pretty clear about this.

  • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was this real? Did I mandela effect it from the negative zone or something? Am I just getting old?

    I think so. I don’t think Scott Pilgrim had anywhere near the cultural impact you’re assigning to it. This is my anecdotal memory, so take it for what it is.

    When it came out, it did well, people talked about it for like a week or two, and then everyone moved on to whatever the next movie was, like most popular movies. It didn’t have even half the cultural impact of Fight Club, people weren’t still quoting it years after it came out, I had honestly forgotten about it till everyone here started talking about it again. Even among the bigger fans of the movie I’ve met, none of them emulated Scott, consensus seemed to be he was a douche. Even I got that when I first saw it and I sucked at media analysis back then. They cast fucking Micheal Cera to play him, people have hated that dweeb since he was in Arrested Development, he mostly gets cast as annoying assholes these days.

    I think the movie got made because annoying hipsters were a thing at the time it came out, there were already tons of memes about how annoying hipsters were, years before the film was even in Pre-production. I don’t think the film made any significant contribution to the population of hipsters. I was a bit of a hipster back then, and I liked the movie but it didn’t inspire me to be more of a hipster, if anything it made me wanna cool it a bit.

    So I don’t know why everyone is assigning all this cultural capital to a movie that was about as influential as Weekend at Bernie’s.

      • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying the message of the movie was great but I don’t really think it had that much impact on the world. People thought it was a fun mid-budget movie. At the time it came out we had a sorta similar thing to what we have going on now with Marvel movies dominating everything, it was just grim gritty action movies. Scott Pilgrim was colorful and not afraid to have cheeky inside humor. People liked it, but it was forgotten fast, the Fast and Furious movies probably had more overall impact on the cultural zeitgeist.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never even heard of this movie. Granted I’m pretty old, but still.

      Also, how dare you slander the cinematic masterpiece that is Weekend at Bernie’s?!

  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people missed the point of it, but I don’t really know what, if anything in that entire movie could be seen as aspirational. Playing the bass? Cheating on a teenager with a girl with dyed hair? Getting in a sword fight in a club? Like, nothing in that movie is the type of thing I would describe as a goal.

    • Juiceyb [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m an old fart, and movies like this were always made. But it made little impact at the time because Kick-ass ruined this genre right before this movie came out. If anything, this movie feeds off nostalgia by a group of people who missed this movie in theaters because they were too young to drive themselves there.

  • CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember people were charmed by it for a while because it had a lot of video game jokes that were really natural and unforced, which is something I don’t think any other movie before or since has managed to pull off.

    But I also remember people stopped talking about it pretty quick. I was in college in California at the time so that’s my reference point.

    • Red Wizard 🪄
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I liked Scott Pilgrim for the action and visuals. Good action, funny dialogue, great visual style. Never walked out of the film idolizing Scott Pilgrim at all.

  • DamarcusArt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know if the creators of the movie “got the point” either. That movie really feels like Hollywood fundamentally misunderstanding another medium (in this case comics) as usual. The alternate ending worked much better for the movie I think.

    The comic really drives the point home about how being a shitty hipster makes you a pretty shitty person, with silly video game style boss fights thrown in. It’s a great read, with the characters becoming increasingly insufferable the older you are compared to them. Edit: This sounds like a negative, but it is deliberate and works really well in the context of the story.

  • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    what i don’t get about all the discourse around here lately when it comes to this movie is attacking the wrong ‘bad part’ of the movie (as someone who has been a fan of it)

    no one I know was influenced by scott, if anything he’s the opposite of an aspirational figure - there is little, if any, cultural impact stemming from his character.

    who we SHOULD be talking about is Ramona, and the way in which the Manic Pixie Dream Girl girlfriend became such an integral part of the 2010s culture, it’s impact on dudes who saw themselves as sitting outside the mainstream who now thought that an MPDG would fix them, and how this in turn affected women (feeding into internalised ‘not like other girls’ misogyny that was coming from spaces like early Tumblr)

    • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      As much of Scott’s character arc the movie had to skip over, they pretty much gutted Ramona’s entire arc in service of keeping the runtime manageable. A large part of the point of the comics is that they’re both terrible people with a trail of ruined lives behind them and they both have to become better for themselves, each other, and everyone else.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big oof. I was the manic pixie dream girlboyfriend for a bunch of people in the '10s. It was really easy for people to play with you for a while then throw the toy away when they found out that “manic” also comes with severe depression and sometimes real, actual, scary mania. : p

  • I remember the movie having all the cultural impact of a wet fart, particularly considering it did pretty poorly at the box office, even if it did develop an audience later.

    Has anyone ever really watched a movie with a character played by Michael Cera and thought, “Oooh, him! I want to be just like him!”

        • Red Wizard 🪄
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one wants to be Alan in Barbieland I think, but Alan outside of Barbieland would be a pretty cool dude to have around. That dude can throw down.

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do like the Michael Cera is one of the few A-list (at least once upon a time) male actors in Hollywood who looks boy-ish and nerdy and isn’t a typical square jawed hunk. Even Timothy C and others are still very masculine and square-jawed.

        Kind of feelsbadman as a roundfaced boyish looking guy when everyone mocks Michael Cera constantly, definitely feel like a lot of the venom aimed at him comes from a toxic masculinity place

        • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh huh, I never thought about it that way. I do feel like I’ve kinda heard that sort of mocking of him.

          Still think he’s an awful Scott though!

          • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah I think a lot of what undergirds a lot of the dislike of him is that he’s atypically “low T” and skinny for what you would expect of a Hollywood actor, who are all buff hunks or adonis-like twinks or fat comic reliefs. It’s similar to the hate people have for fat women that oozes out when they talk about them.

            Scott’s character is an immature jerk for sure. Some of Michael Cera’s characters are sweet and cool though, like George Michael.

  • Ericthescruffy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember I was part of a very small cadre of people who went to go see it while there was a line around the block for the latest “Expendables” movie. It was definitely always more of a cult film, but it definitely had a huge impact on the people who were fans of it (especially those who were also in media). It’s kinda like the Speed Racer movie in that sense I guess.

    As for myself: I saw it in my early 20s when it came out and I definitely got that Scott was not “aspirational”…but I also didn’t get just how much of a fucking asshole he was until my 30s so…mixed bag.

  • Othello [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ive seen one fight inspired by this movie in the middle school also its trash and he sexually assaults the lesbian character, like no one talks about that. it upset me so much in middle school i stopped talking to my aunt who recommended it to me for a week lol.

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember an insufferable vegan guy being a huge fan of the movie, but I didn’t notice any dive bar activity in the UK.

    Back then Wetherspoons were dingy old depressing pubs full of old men and moulding furniture.

    Now they’ve all gone upmarket and you’d have to fight to find a nice comfortably depressing place to get drunk for under a tenner.

    I don’t blame the film for that though, just the rising cost of living forcing stay-at-home-barkeepers to reconsider whether it’s worth keeping the pub open, or selling to some startup removed.