I recently stumbled on take on the Khrushchev Lied https://mltoday.com/khrushchev-lied-but-what-is-the-truth/
And I wanted to know if this makes sense or am I missing something and what is known about the stances of Grover Furr
I recently stumbled on take on the Khrushchev Lied https://mltoday.com/khrushchev-lied-but-what-is-the-truth/
And I wanted to know if this makes sense or am I missing something and what is known about the stances of Grover Furr
So, just to see I understood correctly, in your analysis the book is moslty solid with maybe an overzealous defense of Stalin in a few points, and the text I found does bring up said overzealousness but it engages in some pointless hair splitting that sounds a lot like angry padding, is it?
Good way to put it, very well done. That’s exactly what I meant in a way I couldn’t have said it.
I completely concur with what the comrade above said.