A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don’t know what you’d sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

    • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think getting shot is punishment enough, but Cook should at least be banned from posting anymore pranks to his YouTube. They should really shut down his YouTube channel if we’re being honest and nothing of value will be lost.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pain and emotional suffering is always available. If he pressed charges then all of his legal fees as well. The lost wages from being locked up… etc.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fuck all that. Attitudes like that are why Americans think they can just blast away. You won’t see my pistol until I’m certain killing you is my very last resort. And if I pull it, it’s because I mean to use it.

      Did this idiot think his life was in danger from an annoying man with a cell phone, in the middle of a fucking food court?! No. He used his gun as a “get off of me” tool. He’s damned lucky Cook survived.

      EDIT: I seriously hope some of you people do not conceal carry. The comments here are terrifying and completely ignorant of case law, attitudes comprised only of feels.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re going to wait until you’re hit/shot to try and pull your gun out?

        The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hit the guy. This is exactly when you need to have your gun out.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The aggressor was a loud-mouthed bully in a very public place. I’ve dealt with these assholes since elementary school in the 70s. They’re cowards, one and all. Perhaps such behavior is more threatening to younger folks? I gather kids don’t get their ass beat on the regular in school any longer? In any case, I think I would have instantly known what I was looking at.

          Also, seems the bully didn’t speak any “fighting words”, and that may be key. OTOH, Virginia holds no duty to retreat. Feels like thin legal ice for the shooter.

          And no, I’m not giving him the chance to hit me. I’m hyper aware of my ability to draw. If I felt that option was about to be taken from me? Yeah, that almost certainly would have crossed the line.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He could very well think that. One friend of mine gets a fraid for his saftey if protest is in the area. I have scared the shit out of people by just walking near them.

        Now in the era of mass shooting would i be afraid that some ahole came up to like would i think this is a prelude to getting shot. I might honestly think that

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lmao. Cops shoot people who just ignore them and get a vacation. This guy has a stranger in his face suddenly who won’t leave him alone and keeps getting closer despite repeated commands not to and you think he has no right?

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Cops have no right either, often. They get away with it because they are cops. This guy isn’t getting away with it, nor should he. Just because the system lets off corrupt cops doesn’t mean it let’s everyone off.

            I know he doesn’t have a right to self defense here because I passed my first year courses in law school.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cool, first year law courses. Come back when you’ve spent years doing tactical training. The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hitting them. At which point it’s too late. We don’t live in Hollywood land where the bad guy stands back to let the hero do whatever they want. Court rulings generally support this unless the state is a duty to retreat state. But Virginia is a stand your ground state. (As are most states these days)

              What the YouTuber did is colloquially called Bulldogging and the entire point is to intimidate someone with an intimation of physical threat.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol tactical training? This is a legal question not a bootcamp hypothetical.

                You don’t get to kill people for walking toward you. Nobody would like living in that world. Not even in a stand your ground state is merely walking toward someone an imminent threat to life. You have been tricked if you believe this.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Bootcamp? And just walking toward someone? I see you learned to properly research stuff already. The article at the top describes the video in vivid detail. He got right up on him with intentionally disorienting noises. Pushed the phone right up towards his head. Ignored physical and verbal commands to stop and just got closer. That’s not someone just calmly walking towards you on a sidewalk.

                  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’re right, it’s not someone calmy walking toward you, and you have the right to use reasonable force in self defense in this scenario. Deadly force is not reasonable absent a threat of deadly force or serious bodily injury.

                    The YouTuber had no weapon. Did not in fact intend to harm the victim. Did not touch the victim. Did not say he was going to harm the victim. Did not make any aggressive gestures that he was going to harm him.

                    What fact are you hanging your hat on to say “ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this dude was clearly out to kill me, I had no choice.”

                    He walked towards me babbling while his three friends filmed? I would tear you apart in front of the jury if that’s your defense. You would be in tears realizing how fucked you are.

                    You don’t get to kill someone for walking toward you. You could punch him in the face. Not shoot him in the chest, though.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seems these people are forgetting this was in a, presumably crowded, food court, and not a dark alley. Shooter is on very thin legal ice, very thin.

          Also, seems some of these folks don’t have experience with the garden variety bully. This wasn’t some madman running up on the shooter, this was a bigger guy clearly trying to get a reaction.

          If the aggressor had spoken any “fighting words”, and yes that’s a legal term, I might well have shot him. That does not seem to have been the case.