• ComradeSalad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, there’s not much of a debate there. We have preserved bodies and near perfectly preserved brains.

    The parts of their brain that regulate aspects such as complex thinking and task completion are much much smaller and less developed then Homo sapiens, while the parts of the brain that regulate better eyesight and hearing are better. That’s why they quickly fell behind in group building, tool production, planning, tactics, and etc. A regular Neanderthal would have leveled out at about the intelligence of a 7-8 year old child, no matter how much you taught them or helped them. That’s what allowed us to outbreed and kill them all.

    Yes, we did interbreed with them to a degree, but it was still extremely limited.

    • ☭CommieWolf☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interesting. Perhaps I was giving them the benefit of the doubt in terms of intelligence. In a way buying into the idea that “Human nature” made our ancestors destructive and genocidal to some extent. Reality is probably not anywhere near as extreme.

      • ComradeSalad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty much. We were still in extremely early tribal and nomad societies, so there was hardly any concerted effort to exterminate the Neanderthal. They simply could not outcompete their evolutionary cousins in a few mental aspects, and that’s all it took for them to wither away over thousands of years.