• ButtigiegMineralMap
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      Smh so disappointing they’re like “well we have agricultural safety concerns and we aren’t sure that the policy would work as intended…so let them starve instead nothing we can do so sad”

      • DamarcusArt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        Mask slipping moment there. I think their real motivation is more like this:

        “We would lose global influence if food were a human right, as we heavily subsidise our food industry so we can export it for cheap, destroying local food production in other countries and forcing them to be reliant on our “humanitarian” aid.”

        • ButtigiegMineralMap
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh no doubt, but they can’t go out and say that, I just mean their “official” statement is extremely disappointing because they’d only release a statement on a UN vote like that if they know it’s fucked up. Obviously they give the most professional sounding excuse but that “professional” excuse of theirs is especially disrespectful given the fact that we all know they’re lying on top of being just legitimately evil

    • VolatileExhaustPipe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wasn’t it basically trying to push IP rights and extra judicial arbiters on the other nations?