You’re right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this:
Classical economy always loved to conceive social capital as a fixed magnitude of a fixed degree of efficiency. But this prejudice was first established as a dogma by the arch-Philistine, Jeremy Bentham, that insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence of the 19th century. Bentham is among philosophers what Martin Tupper is among poets. Both could only have been manufactured in England.
Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk?
Tbf they do sound like they could be a Marxist now.
with how much they’re reading lemmygrad I’m tempted to post quotes and links to theory at the end of my comments
Just be careful with the dunks or they’ll use them against us lol
they’re going to do that anyway. it’s a bad reason not to dunk.
You’re right, at that. I was thinking of dunks like this:
Imagine if libs came along with wit like this. Unlikely, still, but is it worth the risk?
(A: yes)
ahh but see, this proves my point. theory is the highest form of dunk. cf literally anything Lenin ever wrote.
Like this rolled into one: https://youtu.be/ORfjgE6n2Pc