Alright I know this is terminally online behavior but I keep seeing this thrown around, and I would like to know the story behind this claim, with evidence. I wasn’t an ML when Bay Area was doxxed and have only really seen a few if his archives videos.
Please do not reply with “this is online drams slop” or whatever, I’m just seeking information on thus topic and recognize it’s terminally online behavior.
If by evidence you mean screenshots of BadEmpanada actually admitting to the act of doxxing bayarea415 or detailed forensics of BE collecting data from BA415, well there is none that I found.
HOWEVER, there was a post in Lemmygrad where a user explained that BadEmpanada was actually celebrating the doxxing against bayarea415 and even broadcast some PII(Personal Identifiable Information) that were available from the doxxing -> https://lemmygrad.ml/post/1426210
The “foreclosure lawyer” data is PII and BE should have never shared that information in his channel.
Sadly, due to the problem with the images in Lemmygrad, some of the images posted by that user won’t load.
Thank you, this was more so a curiosity behind a common claim.
No worries! If we really are strict and define doxxing as collecting, verifying and publishing PII from a victim, then BE did dox BA415 by broadcasting his job role. However, there is no evidence of BE collecting(hacking) or verifying BayArea415.