You do realize that throughout the late 70’s and 80’s Gaddafi reconsidered this stance and halted the Islamation of Libyan law correct? People can change their minds on certain topics, especially after seeing how the initial approach was not working.
I never said this quote was genuine. I said that Gaddafi’s position on the Islamation of Libyan law changed and he reversed the majority of his early 70’s Islamic policies by the early 80’s.
There is no need to be as aggressive as you are. Almost every thread you reply to is in hostility, like we are fighting you or we are your enemies. You could have just asked me to clarify what I meant.
Aggressive in the sense of accusing everyone in the thread of “chauvinist Islamophobia”, and “militant atheism” with no backing, simply for discussing religion. I cannot even find a single sentence in any way discussing Islam at all. Most of the people instead are referring and demeaning Christianity if anything.
I also have not seen any “militant atheists” other then a single person who is heavily downvoted. Everyone is simply discussing the failures of a theological state, and how theocracy is incompatible with socialism. If people were putting words in Gaddafi’s mouth or inventing history, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but everyone is simply giving their own personal observation of theocracy by observing the message of the quote, even if it may not be real itself. So no one is “disrespecting” revolutionary heroes.
I gotta slightly push back on this. I think its very fair to say that Islam, Christianity and Buddhism aren’t the core of the problem, the problem is them being co-opted by western imperialism.
I still think that religion itself is actively harmful, even in subtle ways, and that as a whole humanity will be better off without religion. But I also understand that religion acts as a painkiller, and might have a small amount of relief or comfort for those in the Global South demonized by capitalism.
And I also understand that its better to reduce the influence, spread and hold that religion has on people by removing the poverty and material conditions that spur people to use religion as a painkiller in the first place, rather than forcing it out of people at gunpoint.
Humans aren’t always perfectly rational, and our beliefs and actions are colored by numerous different perceptions, emotions, biases, cultural influences, and I just see no good that religion can offer that can’t otherwise be offered by a secular socialist society, and that won’t color or influence your mind in ways of literal magical-thinking that religion does and science doesn’t.
I should note that I’m a Latino Amerikkkan in the deep south and I was raised Catholic.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
You do realize that throughout the late 70’s and 80’s Gaddafi reconsidered this stance and halted the Islamation of Libyan law correct? People can change their minds on certain topics, especially after seeing how the initial approach was not working.
deleted by creator
I never said this quote was genuine. I said that Gaddafi’s position on the Islamation of Libyan law changed and he reversed the majority of his early 70’s Islamic policies by the early 80’s.
There is no need to be as aggressive as you are. Almost every thread you reply to is in hostility, like we are fighting you or we are your enemies. You could have just asked me to clarify what I meant.
deleted by creator
Aggressive in the sense of accusing everyone in the thread of “chauvinist Islamophobia”, and “militant atheism” with no backing, simply for discussing religion. I cannot even find a single sentence in any way discussing Islam at all. Most of the people instead are referring and demeaning Christianity if anything.
I also have not seen any “militant atheists” other then a single person who is heavily downvoted. Everyone is simply discussing the failures of a theological state, and how theocracy is incompatible with socialism. If people were putting words in Gaddafi’s mouth or inventing history, I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but everyone is simply giving their own personal observation of theocracy by observing the message of the quote, even if it may not be real itself. So no one is “disrespecting” revolutionary heroes.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I gotta slightly push back on this. I think its very fair to say that Islam, Christianity and Buddhism aren’t the core of the problem, the problem is them being co-opted by western imperialism.
I still think that religion itself is actively harmful, even in subtle ways, and that as a whole humanity will be better off without religion. But I also understand that religion acts as a painkiller, and might have a small amount of relief or comfort for those in the Global South demonized by capitalism.
And I also understand that its better to reduce the influence, spread and hold that religion has on people by removing the poverty and material conditions that spur people to use religion as a painkiller in the first place, rather than forcing it out of people at gunpoint.
Humans aren’t always perfectly rational, and our beliefs and actions are colored by numerous different perceptions, emotions, biases, cultural influences, and I just see no good that religion can offer that can’t otherwise be offered by a secular socialist society, and that won’t color or influence your mind in ways of literal magical-thinking that religion does and science doesn’t.
I should note that I’m a Latino Amerikkkan in the deep south and I was raised Catholic.