My hunch is yes, because of how successful English agrarian capitalism was early on… but likely more slowly?

  • davel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I see. I’ve heard arguments that colonialism was a necessary factor in capitalism’s development, but I haven’t read enough yet to be fully convinced. I’m convinced that it was a major, major factor, like the enclosure of the commons was. You might argue that it was the incipient stages of capitalism—mercantilism—that allowed for expensive & somewhat risky seafaring ship trade that is closely tied to colonialism. I’m not sure at what point to wind the clock back to and what to tweak such that feudalism evolves into something other than capitalism.