I like the dude but obviously he also confirms my biases so who knows.

But the only people I see talking bad about him are usually trots and borgeouis historians, what do you all think?

  • stella_midnight
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Surely there are more accurate and descriptive terms to use for the range of possible outcomes other than “cancelled” which is a contemporary, ill-defined, and temporary term to encompass a wide range of circumstances.

    It’s also based in arrogance in that it assumes the person being “cancelled” somehow has a permanent entitlement to their position or title, that regardless of their behavior the market owes them a permanent place and recognition. This is bourgeois nonsense.

    Censorship, market conditions, silencing, etc. are far better descriptors of most circumstances where “cancelled” is used.