I know the wording is weird but I hope you guys get what I’m saying. For example, what Nazi Germany was doing obviously justified it being taken down. I know generally the reasons given by western govts for invading countries is bs lies used to justify colonialism, exploitation, etc but I’m saying if said invasion was done by a socialist country without a military industrial complex and profit in command. Perhaps Tibet is an example of this but I just don’t know much about that at all. Would China for example be justified in invading Israel and giving power/land back to Palestinians? Self determination is a very key aspect of ML and I’m wondering how far that goes.
My guess is when the global theater of things permits an state that harms their own citizens get taken and make it socialist without provoking a worse impact in the rest of the world.
That’s the only thing it actually matters, regarding a Materialist and Dialectical analysis. Because ideologically, all capitalist, feudalist and theocracist states are already on the list of “should be taken down and made socialist”.