According to Marxist Historical Materialism, humans were relatively egalitarian in prehistoric times. In the neolithic times, agriculture( farming, herding) created a surplus and in guarding that surplus classes developed which led to gender oppression with continues to this day. According to this guy steven goldberg patriarchy is a central innate element of humanity due to testosterone or whatever. How do we as Marxists respond to theories like this?

  • Max
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 years ago

    How does he respond to societies that didn’t have patriarchy as a central element—which we (at least at this point) seem to have extensive anthropological evidence for? Seems like that’s the end of it—unless he just does a huge amount of crude historical revisionism, I do not know how you could possibly make his argument with a straight face. The eternal patriarchy is definitely a common appeal to nature in 2022, but not an intellectual position anyone who is taken seriously consciously holds.