I don’t know what you mean by that question. Can you elaborate on it? There are different kinds of voting systems, each having their own costs and benefits. I prefer preferential voting, where there are X>Y candidates filling Y spaces and then the voting is preferential, people just put people on list 1-X, where 1 is most preferred and X is least preferred and then top Y people are chosen. Then the system itself forces them into a team, because they now govern region. There are mathematical ways that ensure that the best arrangements of candidates is possible to ensure the maximum average rank of the individuals. But, then again, Y could be equal to 1 :)
Oh I mean also having a one party system is more democratic cause you vote for leaders instead of representatives for a particular party with particular takes.
I don’t know what you mean by that question. Can you elaborate on it? There are different kinds of voting systems, each having their own costs and benefits. I prefer preferential voting, where there are X>Y candidates filling Y spaces and then the voting is preferential, people just put people on list 1-X, where 1 is most preferred and X is least preferred and then top Y people are chosen. Then the system itself forces them into a team, because they now govern region. There are mathematical ways that ensure that the best arrangements of candidates is possible to ensure the maximum average rank of the individuals. But, then again, Y could be equal to 1 :)
Oh I mean also having a one party system is more democratic cause you vote for leaders instead of representatives for a particular party with particular takes.