• @Hagels_Bagels
    link
    113 years ago

    They want to promote controversial opinions to get more engagement. Simple as that.

    • @Cetacean_Posadist
      link
      93 years ago

      i imagine its more a function of “people who have similar activity to you frequently responded to these comments,” and in practice with any sort of political content that’s going to be opinions you disagree with.

      i realize its a bit of a chicken and egg situation but i dont think they postulated “oh controversial opinions will get more engagement, lets tweak the algorithm to show that to people.” its that the algorithm led itself to doing that and they’re very happy to let it.

      i dont intend to discount the lack of ethics here whatsoever but i just find this kind of simple profit-seeking logic resulting in complex shitty outcomes both fascinating and ubiquitous when analyzing capital’s behavior. so often we attribute an individual’s intent and planning to things that are really emergent complexities of capital’s simple process of profit selection.

      anyways im sure everybody already knows this i just find it morbidly neat.

      • loathesome dongeater
        link
        53 years ago

        i imagine its more a function of “people who have similar activity to you frequently responded to

        I think that’s what they meant. The algorithm will prioritise tweets that the user perceives as controversial.

        • @Cetacean_Posadist
          link
          23 years ago

          yeah i didnt really mean it as a correction or anything i had just taken my ritalin and was rambling about something i find interesting

    • Muad'DibberOPMA
      link
      83 years ago

      Yup, if there is no controversy, they’ll manufacture one.