• CriticalResist8A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who has the monopoly of violence in Luhansk and Donetsk currently…?

    • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      A group that already has a presence in the UN? I was talking about how recognition works for countries. But low and behold that nuance escapes you. It’s not my fault that u & 72 don’t understand how international recognition and civil wars work.

      • CriticalResist8A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It doesn’t matter that you hold elections but that you hold the monopoly of violence over the population. That’s what gets you recognition.

        You’re contradicting yourself you’re contradictinnnggggg yourself hahaha it’s okay to admit you exhausted your line of arguing and can’t defend anything more. Come to the tankie side, it’s not so bad. We’re right all the time.

        • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not my fault you don’t know how occupation works. I’m specifically talking about a separatists Donbas that is able to fend off both Ukraine and Russia assaults could obtain recognition by the international community through securing it’s borders. Of course you intentionally misunderstood what I’m saying at all times and declare victory by being a dumbass

          • CriticalResist8A
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            But Donbass doesn’t want to fight off Russia, they voted to join them, remember?

            Your trolling is weak, please do better. You’re entertaining but you need to step up your game.

            • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Never met a true US civil war Confederate supporter, the south had their own government & constitution and voted to leave the union. I guess according to your logic the northern federal government was in the wrong in order to preserve the union cuz the south had elections & elections.

                • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Hey by your criteria all you gotta do is have a vote and boom bang beyowza u gotta new country. I suppose since you’re a tankie you have to pretend things like national sovereignty just doesn’t exist so u can get away with invading your neighbor.

              • MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                DID THE SLAVES VOTE IN THOSE ELECTIONS?

                If Texas today had a vote to secede then they’d have absolutely every right to secede since the current electoral laws allow for the will of the people to be expressed.

                The fact you didn’t stop to think about the slaves is because you’re a fucking cracker.

                • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  What does it matter if they did or not?

                  Which electoral law in Texas allows for this? Do you know what the supremacy clause is? Do you have a fucking Clue what you’re talking about? Clearly you don’t.