• VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    lol this is FlightRadar24 which relies on members of the public with ADSB receivers transmitting information to the platform. If an area doesn’t have a dude with a gadget they get from FR24 then there is no coverage. This happens all the time in sparsely populated areas, and even in moderately populated areas due to terrain features impacting signal reception at certain altitudes. ADSB is also likewise not required if you’re outside 30 miles of a major Class B airport, or if you submit an airspace waiver, and if you submit a privacy application to the FAA your ADSB data won’t even be publicly viewable at all on any of the commercial ADSB tracking platforms. The fact that commercially-available ADSB data briefly dropped off in rural America during approach to landing is one of the most normal things to ever happen.

    ADSB isn’t “radar”. “ADSB Radar” is not a thing. If you’re not transmitting ADSB you would still appear on a radar screen. ATC radar screen recordings aren’t publicly accessible.

    Directly from FR24:

    Flightradar24 has a network of more than 50,000 ADS-B ground based receivers around the world that receive flight information from aircraft with ADS-B transponders and send this information to our servers. Due to the high frequency used (1090 MHz) the coverage from each receiver is limited to about 250-450 km (150-250 miles) in all directions depending on location. The farther away from the receiver an aircraft is flying, the higher it must fly to be covered by the receiver. The distance limit makes it very difficult to get terrestrial ADS-B coverage over oceans.

    People in general overestimate the extensive of civilian flight surveillance capabilities. There are many parts of the country where you can’t even get in contact with ATC below 3000 feet.

    “Plane turned off its Radar” (by which they mean the transponder, the ADSB-Out transmitter, or something else?) is not a conclusion you can draw from FlightRadar24.

    Here’s the same issue from a flight on September 8:

    I’m an airline pilot and part-time flight instructor and I’ve had flights to certain areas where the ADSB coverage “mysteriously” drops off before picking up again near the destination (airports tend to be near population centers, therefore someone transmitting information to FR24 is more likely). It didn’t involve me having my “radar illegally turned off”.

    We can do better than posting twitter speculation from people who have no clue what they’re talking about.

    Edit: And for non-towered airports in rural America, even radar coverage tends to be spotty. Radar services are usually terminated before you drop out of coverage and you have to call the controller from the ground after landing to let them know you didn’t crash and die.

    There are hundreds of planes around the country flying around with no radios, no ADSB, and below radar coverage in rural areas every day. And it’s not illegal.

    This escape plan doesn’t even make any sense. A private jet on an IFR plan is one of the most trackable means of transportation of all time. And they went through all that trouble only to land at the next state over? On a plane registered to known Zionists? You can land a private jet in Canada and 9/10 times there will be no customs officer even sent out to inspect the plane. You could head to Northern Canada, where there is basically zero coverage of anything in the lower levels.

    TLDR: FR24 isn’t an all-seeing eye, it’s a crowdsourced commercial flight tracking platform that gets very janky once you get down low away from densely populated areas. I recommend using ADSBExchange because it ignores the FAA privacy flags for certain aircraft and you therefore get more extensive data.

    Edit 2: I just took a look on FR 24 and the flight to PGA has complete data it seems like:

    FR24 doesn’t have the return flight to PVU which is viewable on ADSBExchange. The flight path seems to conform with the usually assigned route. For instance they probably used this departure:

    Additionally the clearance delivery contact for PGA is listed as a phone number, meaning ATC cannot be reached from the ground or at lower altitudes:

    More info on PGA comms here:

    • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just too on the nose. “israel” runs Jeffery Epstein sexual blackmail ring and traffics underage girls. They then also run cover organization dedicated to “helping” victims of that kind of stuff. Makes it much more believable that something is going on to my brain.

      • lemmyseizethemeansOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cui bono. Could not have come at a better time for Trump. The entire thing smells like Israeli sniper.

        • sexywheat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The entire thing smells like Israeli sniper.

          When I put on my TrueAnon hat I’ve come to the same conclusion. I mean, it’s exactly their playbook. Incite or allow a terrorist attack to happen, and it conveniently plays right into and gives them pretext to do what they wanted to (or were going to do) anyway.

          This gives the right wing a martyr and gives Trump the pre-text to violently clamp down on Palestine protesters the “woke” left.

          Also, Kirk was running his mouth about Israel a lot lately (as you’ve pointed out) including on a podcast where he claimed that the IDF ordered a stand-down on Oct 7th to let the Hamas attack happen. I think he was also on another podcast claiming that free speech was being impacted in USA due to Israel.

          Get two birds stoned at once, as they say.

          EDIT: Good thing I don’t wear my TrueAnon hat very often.

          • lemmyseizethemeansOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep. Of course we’ll probably never know but there are so many datapoints that form an arrow as it were… look at how Trump was the one that got to officially announce his death first. And immediately blamed the ‘radical left’. No suspect or anything just put it straight on us. And then Crowder adds info chaff by saying the bullets had pro-trans messaging. Totally ready to run with this narrative and here we go, green light for right wing domestic terrorists to exact their revenge.

            • sexywheat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Some high-ranking Pissraelis were also saying the same thing about the radical left etc.

              On the other hand, who knows, maybe it was just some random guy who did it.

              Maybe we’ll find out, or maybe we won’t.

    • LangleyDominos [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The House blocked the release of the files before the shooting. The Senate blocked release during the shooting. If the shooting never happened, we still wouldn’t be getting the files. It doesn’t matter if people are talking about Epstein if nobody in power is willing to do anything or can do anything.

      • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        But it does matter that nobody is asking them why they’re blocking the release of the Epstein files.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    If it turns out it was actually an Israeli or Zionist “hit” … I just… I don’t know what I will think.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The questions we laypeople who have no experience in an area need to ask when someone raises an idea like this is “Is this actually unusual activity? Or is this actually just a relatively common thing that regular people just never pay attention to?” It’s like every time the goverment starts talking about UFOs, suddenly, a lot more laypeople start reporting UFO sightings. Are there actually more things flying around up there? No, people are just paying attention to something they usually ignore and know nothing about, so they see “weird” lights and assume it must be related to the Important Thing that is currently happening, when they’re just seeing planes, satellites, meteors, planets etc.

    People are really good at pattern recognition, too good, we spot patterns everywhere, where they don’t exist and it is easy to connect the dots of unrelated events without realising that is what we are doing. The important thing is to thoroughly investigate and challenge ideas, even those that “make sense”