• Commiejones
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fuck me! We aren’t going to eat the bugs in the pods. We are going to eat climate change.

    • 201dberg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Came in here like
      “If someone hasn’t made a " holy fuck, China isn’t going to just save us from climate change, they area going to fucking EAT climate change” joke, I am gonna be real sad… Then make one."
      So, thanks comrade.

    • Comprehensive49
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not really. This falls under CO2 utilization, which converts waste CO2 into more useful stuff. Because cows/pigs eat the yeast protein, and we eat the cows/pigs and burn them as calories, we re-release the CO2 in our breath.

      This tech is better classed as precision fermentation, and unfortunately has little to do with fighting climate change.

      • REEEEvolution
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Indirectly it has to do with ficghting climate change tho. The utilized CO2 stems from heavy industry, meaning heavy industry can now double as supplier for the basics of food production. As the resulting yeast is much more efficient per hectare than soy, this means less deforestation for soy fields. Meaning the CO2 bound in the forests stays right there. Less CO2 emissions, fuck yeah!

        • Comprehensive49
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Good point, though I don’t think deforestation is a big problem in China anymore. What more efficient food production does allow is reforesting excess soy farming fields, which will definitely sequester carbon while restoring the environment.

          • REEEEvolution
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            If the technology catches on it could have major impact in some places, namely south america.

      • GreatSquare
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Could they theoretically store or just bury the yeast as a means of carbon capture ?

        • Comprehensive49
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, you could just bury organic carbon for carbon sequestration. However, using your custom engineered yeast enzyme to do this is pretty dumb when you could just use waste plant biomass like SinkCo Labs does.

          Herein lies the fundamental economic problem with carbon sequestration: you spend money to produce nothing.