• BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    that which is demonstrably false is just that, your personal offense notwithstanding. the facts do not care about your feelings.

    • Black AOC
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then demonstrate it, with evidence, not with third-party opinion columns. Or are you just going off your feelings about WSJ to back up your hot air?

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moving the Goalposts

        Moving the goalposts is an informal fallacy in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. That is, after an attempt has been made to score a goal, the goalposts are moved to exclude the attempt. The problem with changing the rules of the game is that the meaning of the result is changed, too.

          • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            of course they’re from wikipedia-- I even link there. it’s no secret, nor are you some great detective for pointing that out, lmao

            and, obviously, I’m not going to engage in an argument that’s fallacious, giving it legitimacy. what’s amusing is that you - or anyone - takes offense to this.

            do better.

              • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “I know you are but what am I” is not an effective form of debate. nor is:

                Ad hominem

                Ad hominem (Latin for ‘to the person’), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is “A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong”.

                  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    it no surprise that you cannot see the relevance when your argument depends on your inability to see it.

        • Black AOC
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Y’know, your insufferability, and your willful ignorance-- it reminds me of a certain DNC-paid twitter shill. BrooklynDadDefiant, is that you? I don’t acknowledge wikipedia link-dumping. Show the cold, hard, evidence of what you speak, or for the love of whatever settler-colonial god you worship, quit inconveniencing the electrons.

          Or y’know what, don’t. I’m not wasting my time ‘debating’ some redditor pissant.