I went to Sainsburys today. As I got to the self-checkouts, I could see there was a much bigger queue than usual. I soon found out why: they have just updated all of the self-checkouts, and the new software is glitchy. About half the people there checking out were requiring assistance from the staff, and the three staff members could barely keep up.
For a while now all of the self checkouts have had screens above them that record, or at least watch you while you scan. You can see yourself in the screen, I assume it’s to deter theft. I started scanning my items, and immediately I found out what the new software is. On the first item, the screen snapped an image of my face, and kept the image on screen above me, while the screen in front of me that shows the scanned items got a big warning flashing up on it, declaring that I had bagged an item that I hadn’t scanned.
Both screens froze like this, my face on the screen above with a message in huge letters on the screen below declaring to the entire shop I had bagged something without scanning. Declaring me a thief to the entire shop, even though I hadn’t done anything. Because the staff were so busy with all the glitches I had to wait there like this for about 10 minutes until someone would deal with it.
As I waited I watched the other checkouts and saw that this glitchy new tech was doing the same thing to other people. It seems ridiculous, it’s made the process longer, caused a bigger queue, and is wrongly accusing everyone of stealing. It seems counter-intuitive, they want more people to use self checkouts but this is going to put me off using them in future.
I dread to think what they’ll come up with next. Maybe they’ll eventually get rid of all cashiers and when the machine accuses you of stealing there will be no one to check your items and see that you haven’t. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have robot police waiting to arrest you for supposedly unscanned items soon.
And let’s not forget this is to stop starving, poverty-stricken people from accessing food in the only way some people have.


Yeah these loss-prevention programs are getting so intrusive and inconvenient, they’re killing more business by turning people off from shopping there than they’re saving in shoplifting prevented.
deleted by creator
Best part about the cage is that half the time when you do get an employee to help they just hand you the item and go back to what they were doing rather than walk it to the front with you. I’m stealing it on principles now
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Why?
I was using sainsburys online ordering recently when I was unable to walk for a while, and I prefer to shop in store. With the online ordering they were sending me items that had reached their use-by date already, vegetables that were rotten, mushrooms that were slimy and black and some items were out of stock and they sent me substitutes I didn’t want. So I would much rather go and choose my own items.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
But whenever they’ve sent me bad quality items I’ve rejected them on delivery and got a refund.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
There’s no guarantee that the people turned off from retail shopping by overreaching loss prevention will go to the retailer’s online store. It’s more likely that if someone finds Target annoying because everything is locked up, they’ll go to Amazon instead than Target’s website.
I think it’s a convenient cover for shoddy management. Bad bookkeeping? Supply chain is a mess? Cheap shipping means goods are damaged in transit? Just blame it all on shoplifters and then you’re off the hook.
deleted by creator
relevant Duckman rant.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: