I reported that, but no action was taken.

Calling for ethnic cleansing of Kurds at the hands of Islamic fascists should be against the rules… right?

  • multitotalOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    14 days ago

    I didn’t want to link so it doesn’t come across as I am asking people to go pile up on a person. I reported it this morning. I’ll send you a link in a PM if that’s ok.

    But in what context can genocide/ethnic cleansing/repression of a people be OK?

    • Muad'DibberA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 days ago

      We have no idea if x person said x, because you’re not linking anything.

    • DamarcusArt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Which person are you talking about? Yourself? Because it sounds like you don’t want context lest people find out this isn’t at all what you’re claiming it is.

      • multitotalOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        It is precisely what I claim it is. What does tl;dr mean? “too long; didn’t read” tl;dr is a summary of one’s points and arguments. Anything before a tl;dr isn’t necessary to understand the tl;dr by definition.

        The person summarised their own words into a tl;dr, unprompted. How can you blame me for that?

        You’re just looking for an excuse to defend calls for ethnic cleansing because you happen to agree with it.

        • DamarcusArt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          You DARVO losers always follow the same pattern. You make HUGE assumptions about everyone else and put words in everyone else’s mouth while demanding everyone else praise you for it. You present your enemies as the worst people on earth and allow no discussion of the topic, trying to threaten or browbeat everyone else into obeying you. Fuck off with that shit, it has no place here.

          • multitotalOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            You DARVO losers always follow the same pattern. You put words in everyone else’s mouth. You present…

            You have zero self awareness, you assume I am a part of some group, then go on to assume what I supposedly do, only to then say that I am actually the one doing the assuming. That’s gaslighting.

            Can you argue a point without implying that the person to whom you’re speaking is part of a conspiracy?

            I don’t even know what DARVO is.

            You present your enemies as the worst people on earth and allow no discussion of the topic

            Zero self-awareness. This all started because someone said Rojava were the worst people on Earth, who should be wiped out, and then refused to discuss it.

            Fuck off with that shit, it has no place here.

            Stop your attempts at browbeating. Your whole comment literally applies to you, but you lack the self-awareness to see it.

            • DamarcusArt
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              You are doing a textbook example of DARVO with what you are saying. Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. You deliberately manipulated the narrative to make yourself seem like an innocent victim of a horrible person and lazy/horrible mods. You didn’t actually give anyone any context and acted as if your word alone is good enough to start a witch hunt. I’ve seen where that leads communities, especially online communities. I’m glad that people don’t fall for your manipulative tactics. I’m just calling them out for what they are.

              I agree with you that if the person you are talking about said the things they did it should be something we discuss whether the comment should be removed or a person gets banned. But you didn’t actually provide any context for the conversation. This is awful, weaselly, manipulative behaviour. I will not have this online forum ruined by shitheads like you who can’t handle getting your way 100% of the time. This could’ve been a productive discussion, instead you try to manipulate people into some kind of “mob justice” against your perceived enemies. Fuck you, you manipulative piece of shit.

              EDIT:

              Since I’m done talking to this tosspot, I’ll call attention to their manipulative tactics for anyone reading this conversation.

              1st, they make a claim, no link, just a claim with a call for action attached.

              1. They make it seem like the only possible course of action is to agree with them, as someone who disagrees with them must support the BAD THING (In this case, ethnic cleansing).

              2. People ask for context, they provide none, just a “quote” rather than a link to the conversation or anything people could use to make up their own mind or form their own opinions on this topic. If the person they are talking about is pro-ethnic cleansing, this should be fairly open and shut.

              3. They provide excuses for why they cannot provide context, until others provide that context for them, showing that the conversation isn’t nearly as horrible as they claim it to be, and quite a few people have noted that their response is similar to the one Israel uses, an “all or nothing” claim that if you don’t support fully their position, you are in favour of something horrible and are a horrible person.

              4. I get pissed off at their manipulative tactics and call them out. They obviously do not take well to this, as no one would. They try to make me into another “villain” claiming I am pro-ethnic cleasing for calling them out for not providing context.

              5. They sneakily post a link to the discussion after several others have and now claim that I am lying about them not providing context, when they provided context afterwards, not before.

              6. They claim to have not said a single mean thing to me, while accusing me of being pro-ethnic cleansing for having the gall to ask them for context. Was I being a smarmy shithead here? Absolutely. But that doesn’t excuse this sort of attempt to turn Lemmygrad into their personal mob who attack whomever they disagree with. This whole thing should’ve been a PM to the mods, and not an attempt to rile up a mob to attack someone, regardless of whether that person was saying horrible things or not.

              • multitotalOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                12 days ago

                You are doing a textbook example of DARVO with what you are saying. Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

                No, I am not.

                You deliberately manipulated the narrative to make yourself seem like an innocent victim of a horrible person and lazy/horrible mods.

                No, I didn’t. Where did I mention myself as being the victim? I think you’re arguing against someone else here…

                You didn’t actually give anyone any context and acted as if your word alone is good enough to start a witch hunt.

                I did though. I copied the whole “tl;dr”. How can the person ranting about China be relevant to whether or not Kurds should be ethnically cleansed from northern Syria?

                You wanted to see the “context” because apparently calling for genocide as part of a longer discussion isn’t as bad as outright calling for it. I don’t understand the logic.

                I’m glad that people don’t fall for your manipulative tactics. I’m just calling them out for what they are.

                The only person manipulating here is you. You accuse me of a million things. So far you have not said 1 thing in defense of the person saying what I quoted in my post. Is it because you know its indefensible so you attack me instead?

                if the person you are talking about said the things they did

                doesn’t fit with

                you didn’t actually provide any context for the conversation.

                They did say the things, you’ve probably read the comment by now. I don’t know why you’re saying “if” when it is something we can all see with our eyes.

                Are we judging what they said or the context in which they said it in? Ironic that Kurds receiving help from the US is bad no matter how you look at it (context be damned!), but once someone gets called out for calling Rojava to be “wiped from the map” suddenly context matters. lmao

                I’m just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy.

                This could’ve been a productive discussion, instead you try to manipulate people into some kind of “mob justice” against your perceived enemies.

                “WHY DIDN’T YOU POST THE LINK?!?!”

                “NOOOO! WHY DID YOU POST THE LINK?!THAT’S MOB JUSTICE!!”

                Your post is full of contradictions, strawmen, projection, hypocrisy and lying. Everything you accuse me of in your post, you’re doing yourself.

                Then you top it off with pure insults after I have not said a single mean thing to you. Then you have the audacity to say “fuck you”. I feel sorry for anyone who has to tolerate you.