What makes this ideal as opposed to the four constituent states being separate?
Larger countries have more influence at an international stage.
This is why the Arabs originally petitioned for a unified, independent state after WWII - but were betrayed by the British.
This is well the same reason for the talks of an East African Federation, and turning the Alliance of Sahel States into a single sovereign state as well, right? What are the benefits or potential drawbacks of actually unifying different countries into a single state, as opposed to forming closely-integrated alliances?
1.breaks sykes pecot borders
2.hopefully kills king Abdullah II the tomato salesmanAlright I’m on board
Greater _____ 🤮
Arab Republic 👍tbf the whole region used to be known as Syria
Even though its true, you the respective countries had time to develop their own culture & identity and simply labeling it Syria would certainly ruffle feathers